A Miscellany of Erdős Problems
Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.
Statement
Is it true for every t that
Context
Candidate 2 of the open problems stated in "A Miscellany of Erdős Problems", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
NEW
Problem: Reconstructed statement: for fixed , let be the largest size of a set such that whenever are in and , one has . The conjecture asks whether
for every fixed . This is the natural formalization because the surrounding Erdős problem concerns forcing a “large” difference dividing . If were allowed to vary with , the claim would be false, since gives .
Result: The conjecture is true.
The lower bound is immediate: the odd integers in form an admissible set for every , since the difference of two odd numbers is even and cannot divide the larger odd number. Hence
For the upper bound, fix . Choose a finite set of odd primes such that
is large; this is possible by divergence of .
Let be admissible and put . For each , if , then , because their difference is and . Thus
Summing over , with , gives
For fixed , divisibility by the primes in is asymptotically independent within each parity class, so on both the even and odd integers , has mean and variance at most . By Cauchy–Schwarz,
Therefore
Choosing so that is sufficiently large, and then taking large, yields
Since is arbitrary,
Together with the odd-number construction, this proves
Citation: Problem source: Richard K. Guy, “A Miscellany of Erdős Problems,” Amer. Math. Monthly 90 (1983), 118–120. The proof above is self-contained apart from Euler’s classical divergence of the reciprocal-prime series.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 1 machine checkNo person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.
Machine check · not human verification
machine: correctscope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1
PASS
The proof attacks the intended fixed- extremal statement and is mathematically sound. The prime-pair counting inequality is valid, and the variance/Cauchy–Schwarz averaging over parity classes rigorously yields for large . The odd integers give the matching lower bound. I found no evidence in the available searches of a prior published stronger result.
Novelty assessment
TYPE1
Classification rationale: The result appears genuinely new, but it is a very short elementary resolution of a narrow extremal-density question. The argument uses only reciprocal primes, a simple injection/counting inequality, and Cauchy–Schwarz. It might make a nice problem note because it answers a published Erdős/Guy question, but on its own it is not a substantial combinatorics-journal contribution. Borderline TYPE2 only because of the Erdős provenance; I choose the lower grade.
Literature check: I found no prior occurrence of the resolved statement or a stronger theorem. I searched the Erdős Problems database/forum and teorth/erdosproblems data for “F(n;t)”, “a_j-a_i”, “difference divides”, “consecutive multiples”, and equivalent “gcd equals difference” formulations; no match. OEIS searches for related divisor/difference phrases found only unrelated partition/divisor-graph sequences. GitHub/formal-conjectures searches likewise found no relevant formalization or discussion. No accessible academic-index search result surfaced a matching paper.
Citation: Problem source: Richard K. Guy, “A Miscellany of Erdős Problems,” Amer. Math. Monthly 90 (1983), 118–120.
No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.