ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

A Miscellany of Erdős Problems

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

a-miscellany-of-erdos-problems-2Number Theorymath.COmath.NTposed by Richard Guyrecorded: open · 1 machine check, unexamined

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

Is it true for every t that ¿ limnF(n;t)/n=1/2?\text{¿ }\lim_{n \to\infty}F(n;t)/n=1/2?

Context

Candidate 2 of the open problems stated in "A Miscellany of Erdős Problems", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: Reconstructed statement: for fixed t0t\ge0, let F(n;t)F(n;t) be the largest size of a set A{1,,n}A\subseteq\{1,\dots,n\} such that whenever x<yx<y are in AA and yxyy-x\mid y, one has yxty-x\le t. The conjecture asks whether

    limnF(n;t)n=12\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{F(n;t)}n=\frac12

    for every fixed tt. This is the natural formalization because the surrounding Erdős problem concerns forcing a “large” difference ajaia_j-a_i dividing aja_j. If tt were allowed to vary with nn, the claim would be false, since tnt\ge n gives F(n;t)=nF(n;t)=n.

    Result: The conjecture is true.

    The lower bound is immediate: the odd integers in [n][n] form an admissible set for every tt, since the difference of two odd numbers is even and cannot divide the larger odd number. Hence

    F(n;t)n/2.F(n;t)\ge \lceil n/2\rceil .

    For the upper bound, fix ε>0\varepsilon>0. Choose a finite set PP of odd primes p>tp>t such that

    μ:=pP1p\mu:=\sum_{p\in P}\frac1p

    is large; this is possible by divergence of p1/p\sum_p1/p.

    Let A[n]A\subseteq[n] be admissible and put B=[n]AB=[n]\setminus A. For each pPp\in P, if 2rpA2rp\in A, then (2r1)pA(2r-1)p\notin A, because their difference is p>tp>t and p2rpp\mid 2rp. Thus

    #{aA:a even,pa}#{bB:b odd,pb}.\#\{a\in A:a\text{ even},\,p\mid a\} \le \#\{b\in B:b\text{ odd},\,p\mid b\}.

    Summing over pPp\in P, with w(m)=#{pP:pm}w(m)=\#\{p\in P:p\mid m\}, gives

    aAa evenw(a)bBb oddw(b).\sum_{\substack{a\in A\\ a\text{ even}}} w(a) \le \sum_{\substack{b\in B\\ b\text{ odd}}} w(b).

    For fixed PP, divisibility by the primes in PP is asymptotically independent within each parity class, so on both the even and odd integers n\le n, ww has mean μ+o(1)\mu+o(1) and variance at most μ+o(1)\mu+o(1). By Cauchy–Schwarz,

    A2ZB(2Z+1)O ⁣(nμ).|A\cap 2\mathbb Z|-|B\cap(2\mathbb Z+1)| \le O\!\left(\frac n{\sqrt{\mu}}\right).

    Therefore

    A=A(2Z+1)+A2Zn2+O ⁣(nμ)+o(n).|A| =|A\cap(2\mathbb Z+1)|+|A\cap2\mathbb Z| \le \frac n2+O\!\left(\frac n{\sqrt{\mu}}\right)+o(n).

    Choosing PP so that μ\mu is sufficiently large, and then taking nn large, yields

    A(12+ε)n.|A|\le \left(\frac12+\varepsilon\right)n.

    Since ε>0\varepsilon>0 is arbitrary,

    lim supnF(n;t)n12.\limsup_{n\to\infty}\frac{F(n;t)}n\le \frac12.

    Together with the odd-number construction, this proves

    limnF(n;t)n=12.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{F(n;t)}n=\frac12.

    Citation: Problem source: Richard K. Guy, “A Miscellany of Erdős Problems,” Amer. Math. Monthly 90 (1983), 118–120. The proof above is self-contained apart from Euler’s classical divergence of the reciprocal-prime series.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1

      PASS

      The proof attacks the intended fixed-tt extremal statement and is mathematically sound. The prime-pair counting inequality is valid, and the variance/Cauchy–Schwarz averaging over parity classes rigorously yields A(1/2+ε)n|A|\le (1/2+\varepsilon)n for large nn. The odd integers give the matching lower bound. I found no evidence in the available searches of a prior published stronger result.

      Novelty assessment

      TYPE1

      Classification rationale: The result appears genuinely new, but it is a very short elementary resolution of a narrow extremal-density question. The argument uses only reciprocal primes, a simple injection/counting inequality, and Cauchy–Schwarz. It might make a nice problem note because it answers a published Erdős/Guy question, but on its own it is not a substantial combinatorics-journal contribution. Borderline TYPE2 only because of the Erdős provenance; I choose the lower grade.

      Literature check: I found no prior occurrence of the resolved statement or a stronger theorem. I searched the Erdős Problems database/forum and teorth/erdosproblems data for “F(n;t)”, “a_j-a_i”, “difference divides”, “consecutive multiples”, and equivalent “gcd equals difference” formulations; no match. OEIS searches for related divisor/difference phrases found only unrelated partition/divisor-graph sequences. GitHub/formal-conjectures searches likewise found no relevant formalization or discussion. No accessible academic-index search result surfaced a matching paper.

      Citation: Problem source: Richard K. Guy, “A Miscellany of Erdős Problems,” Amer. Math. Monthly 90 (1983), 118–120.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.