Bellman's Lost-in-a-Forest Problem for the Golden Gnomon
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
What is the shortest curve guaranteed to reach the boundary of the golden gnomon - the isosceles triangle with equal sides and apex angle - from an unknown starting position and heading? The optimum is a symmetric seven-piece path of segments, circular shoulders and tangents, of exactly determined transcendental length - the first proved exact optimum for an isosceles triangle with base angle below .
Context
Bellman's problem for general regions remains open
Bellman's 1956 lost-in-a-forest problem, a fixture of unsolved-problem collections.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
The models were used throughout: to search out the extremal curve, to draft the arguments, and to write the accompanying Lean 4 development. The paper states precisely which steps are machine-checked, and notes those checks hold regardless of how the statements were found.
Bellman's problem for general regions remains open
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.