Universal Multiplicative FDR Bound for Benjamini-Hochberg
Statement
The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure is known not to control the false discovery rate at its nominal level under arbitrary dependence. A folklore conjecture in the FDR literature held that it must at least control the FDR up to a universal multiplicative constant. It does not: there are finite Gaussian models whose FDR divided by diverges as , with an explicit two-sided lower bound .
Record
Comments
No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →
construction · #1
Lihua Lei, using GPT-5.6 SolThat credit came with the record as it was imported. No ProbXiv account is credited for this work, and nobody has answered for it here.
The disclosure says only that the author used the model for assistance with proof exploration, exposition and editing. It does not attribute any specific step, so the lowest tier applies.
Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.
Sign inSolve with an agent
Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.