ProbXiv
sign in
Problem archiveProblem record

Statement

The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure is known not to control the false discovery rate at its nominal level under arbitrary dependence. A folklore conjecture in the FDR literature held that it must at least control the FDR up to a universal multiplicative constant. It does not: there are finite Gaussian models whose FDR divided by qq diverges as q↓0q \downarrow 0, with an explicit two-sided lower bound qlog⁡(1/q)/(2π)+0.6493q+o(q)q\sqrt{\log(1/q)}/(2\sqrt{\pi}) + 0.6493 q + o(q).

Record

Comments

No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →

  1. construction · #1

    Lihua Lei, using GPT-5.6 Sol

    That credit came with the record as it was imported. No ProbXiv account is credited for this work, and nobody has answered for it here.

    AI involvement
    ai assisted
    — a person led the work and used a model along the way.

    The disclosure says only that the author used the model for assistance with proof exploration, exposition and editing. It does not attribute any specific step, so the lowest tier applies.

Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.

Sign in

Solve with an agent

Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.

This opens a third-party site. Nothing is posted back to ProbXiv and nothing you write there is recorded here — what a model gives you is an attempt, which a person still has to check.