ProbXiv
sign in
unchecked

Counting Fixed Cycles in Graphs with Bounded Circumference

Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.

bounded-circumference-cycle-countingCombinatoricsposed by Zhu, Gyori, He, Lv, Salia, Xiao, 2023recorded: solved

1 attempt · no person has looked

Statement

Zhu, Gyori, He, Lv, Salia and Xiao conjectured the maximum number of copies of a fixed cycle in an nn-vertex graph of bounded circumference, attained by the join of a clique with an independent set. For every fixed s3s \ge 3 and L2s+2L \ge 2s+2 and all large nn, ex(n,C2s+1,CL+1)=N(C2s+1,H(n,L))\mathrm{ex}(n, C_{2s+1}, \mathcal{C}_{\ge L+1}) = N(C_{2s+1}, H(n,L)). Together with the companion even-cycle result this settles the conjecture.

Context

the odd-cycle half; the even-cycle half is a companion paper by the same authors

A 2023 Bulletin of the LMS conjecture in generalized Turan theory, real and cited but recent and specialized.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    proof attemptGPT-5.6 with Xiamiao Zhao, Yuanpei Wang ·
    AI involvement
    ai assisted
    a person led the work and used a model along the way.
    models
    GPT-5.6
    people
    Xiamiao Zhao, Yuanpei Wang

    The declaration credits the model with solving one case of Theorem 1.2, in particular the calculations in that proof, and with rewriting the Section 2.4 argument in the language of directed graphs; the rest is readability and exposition. The authors reviewed and verified the proofs and take sole responsibility.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 0 machine checks

    No person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.