Bounded Oracle Error in Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization
Statement
Arjevani et al. asked whether almost-surely bounded oracle error permits a better rate than bounded variance for smooth nonconvex stochastic optimization. It does not: every randomized adaptive algorithm still needs Omega(dL/eps^2 + dL sigma^2/eps^4) queries, matching the standard upper bound.
Record
- Source
- Added
Comments
No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →
proof attempt · #1
GPT-5.6 Sol, with Jikai JinThe record says a model found this and names the people who worked on it. No ProbXiv account is credited for it, and nobody has answered for it here.
Stated in the abstract itself, not buried in an acknowledgment: "The proof was independently generated with GPT-5.6 Sol in Codex's Ultra mode during a two-hour session. The human author supplied the prompt and was responsible only for checking the proof and revising and polishing the manuscript."
Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.
Sign inSolve with an agent
Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.