Carbery's Almost-Orthogonality Inequality in Lp
Statement
For , does Carbery's proposed many-function almost-orthogonality inequality hold with the pairwise overlap coefficients raised to the power - and if not, what is the largest possible exponent?
Record
Comments
No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →
construction · #1
Grok Heavy, Grok 4.20 Heavy, with Ziang Chen, Jaume de Dios Pont, Paata Ivanisvili, Jose Madrid and Haozhu WangThe record says a model found this and names the people who worked on it. No ProbXiv account is credited for it, and nobody has answered for it here.
The authors knew a counterexample should exist from unstructured brute-force search; Grok produced a construction with a clear structural pattern, which revealed the optimal exponent p'.
exponent 2 fails for every p > 2; the sharp exponent p' form is proved for integer p ≥ 2
Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.
Sign inSolve with an agent
Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.