ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

Complexity and Characterization of Set Splitting

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

complexity-and-characterization-of-set-splittingRepresentation Theorymath.COmath.RTposed by Peter Bernstein, Cashous Bortner, Samuel Coskey, Shuni Li, Connor Simpsonrecorded: open · 1 machine check, unexamined

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

Any collection of sets with no empty Venn regions is splittable.

Context

Candidate 1 of the open problems stated in "Complexity and Characterization of Set Splitting", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: Reconstructed statement: Let B={B1,,Bn}\mathcal B=\{B_1,\dots,B_n\} be a finite collection of finite sets. For each nonempty I[n]I\subseteq[n], let

    RI={xiBi:xBi    iI}.R_I=\{x\in\bigcup_iB_i: x\in B_i \iff i\in I\}.

    If every RIR_I is nonempty, then B\mathcal B is splittable: there is SiBiS\subseteq\bigcup_iB_i such that

    SBi{Bi/2,Bi/2}for all i.|S\cap B_i|\in\{\lfloor |B_i|/2\rfloor,\lceil |B_i|/2\rceil\} \quad\text{for all }i.

    This matches Bernstein–Bortner–Coskey–Li–Simpson’s terminology: “splittable” means 1/21/2-splittable, and Venn regions are indexed by nonempty membership patterns. If one also counts the outside region, it is irrelevant because it lies in no BiB_i.

    Result: The conjecture is true.

    Let aI=RI1a_I=|R_I|\ge1. It is enough to choose integers dId_I with

    dIaI(mod2),dIaI,d_I\equiv a_I\pmod2,\qquad |d_I|\le a_I,

    such that for every ii,

    Δi:=IidI\Delta_i:=\sum_{I\ni i}d_I

    is 00 when Bi|B_i| is even and is ±1\pm1 when Bi|B_i| is odd. Then selecting (aI+dI)/2(a_I+d_I)/2 elements from each RIR_I gives a splitter.

    Let

    P={I:aI is odd},qi={IP:iI}.\mathcal P=\{I\ne\varnothing: a_I\text{ is odd}\}, \qquad q_i=|\{I\in\mathcal P:i\in I\}|.

    Then Biqi(mod2)|B_i|\equiv q_i\pmod2.

    We use the standard Boolean-zonotope saturation fact: if qq is the degree vector of a simple hypergraph on [n][n], then ci=qi/2c_i=\lceil q_i/2\rceil is also the degree vector of some simple hypergraph Q\mathcal Q on [n][n]. Applying this to P\mathcal P, choose Q\mathcal Q with

    {IQ:iI}=qi/2.|\{I\in\mathcal Q:i\in I\}|=\lceil q_i/2\rceil.

    Now define

    dI={121IQ,IP,21IQ,IP.d_I= \begin{cases} 1-2\mathbf 1_{I\in\mathcal Q}, & I\in\mathcal P,\\ -2\mathbf 1_{I\in\mathcal Q}, & I\notin\mathcal P. \end{cases}

    If IPI\in\mathcal P, then dI=±1d_I=\pm1, allowed because aIa_I is odd. If IPI\notin\mathcal P, then aIa_I is even and positive, so aI2a_I\ge2, and dI{0,2}d_I\in\{0,-2\} is allowed.

    For each ii,

    Δi=qi2qi/2={0,qi even,1,qi odd.\Delta_i =q_i-2\lceil q_i/2\rceil = \begin{cases} 0,&q_i\text{ even},\\ -1,&q_i\text{ odd}. \end{cases}

    Since Biqi(mod2)|B_i|\equiv q_i\pmod2, this gives exactly the required half, or the floor when Bi|B_i| is odd. Thus B\mathcal B is splittable.

    Verification audit: no assumption beyond finiteness and nonempty nonzero Venn regions was added; even Venn-region sizes are handled using aI2a_I\ge2; odd set sizes use the permitted floor/ceiling convention; the outside Venn region, if present, affects no BiB_i.

    Citation: Definitions: Peter Bernstein, Cashous Bortner, Samuel Coskey, Shuni Li, Connor Simpson, “The set splittability problem,” Australas. J. Combin. 75(2):190–209, 2019; arXiv:1611.01542.
    Auxiliary fact used: the saturation/normality of the Boolean zonotope, equivalently the degree-vector halving property for simple hypergraphs; see e.g. B. Sturmfels, Gröbner Bases and Convex Polytopes, AMS University Lecture Series 8, 1996, on normal affine semigroups from distributive/Boolean configurations.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE2

      PASS

      The proof attacks the stated conjecture correctly. Given the standard Boolean-zonotope/degree-vector halving fact for simple hypergraphs, the construction of Q\mathcal Q is valid, and the defined dId_I have the required parity and size bounds. The resulting sums Δi\Delta_i give exactly half for even Bi|B_i| and floor/ceiling for odd Bi|B_i|. The outside Venn region is correctly irrelevant. I found no fatal gap or mismatch.

      Novelty assessment

      TYPE2

      Classification rationale: This appears genuinely new and resolves a concrete conjecture from the set-splittability literature. The proof is short and relies on a standard Boolean-zonotope / hypergraph degree-vector saturation fact, so it is not a major advance or top-journal result. Still, settling an explicit published/open conjecture with a clean argument should plausibly support a short standalone note in a standard combinatorics journal.

      Literature check: Searches for the exact conjecture phrase and variants (“no empty Venn regions” + “splittable”, “set splittability” + “conjecture”, “all Venn regions” + “splittable”) found only the original set-splittability paper/drafts and mirrors. The published paper proves NP-completeness, characterizes small cases, and gives weaker sufficient/asymptotic conditions, but does not prove this all-Venn-regions statement for arbitrary nn. Related searches for reformulations via complete hypergraphs, balanced edge colorings, discrepancy 11, and Boolean zonotopes did not reveal the resolved statement in the literature.

      Citation: Peter Bernstein, Cashous Bortner, Samuel Coskey, Shuni Li, Connor Simpson, “The set splittability problem,” Australas. J. Combin. 75(2):190–209, 2019; arXiv:1611.01542. Related background: Daniel Condon, Samuel Coskey, Luke Serafin, Cody Stockdale, “On generalizations of separating and splitting families,” Electron. J. Combin. 23(3):P3.36, 2016.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.