Complexity and Characterization of Set Splitting
Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.
Statement
Any collection of sets with no empty Venn regions is splittable.
Context
Candidate 1 of the open problems stated in "Complexity and Characterization of Set Splitting", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
NEW
Problem: Reconstructed statement: Let be a finite collection of finite sets. For each nonempty , let
If every is nonempty, then is splittable: there is such that
This matches Bernstein–Bortner–Coskey–Li–Simpson’s terminology: “splittable” means -splittable, and Venn regions are indexed by nonempty membership patterns. If one also counts the outside region, it is irrelevant because it lies in no .
Result: The conjecture is true.
Let . It is enough to choose integers with
such that for every ,
is when is even and is when is odd. Then selecting elements from each gives a splitter.
Let
Then .
We use the standard Boolean-zonotope saturation fact: if is the degree vector of a simple hypergraph on , then is also the degree vector of some simple hypergraph on . Applying this to , choose with
Now define
If , then , allowed because is odd. If , then is even and positive, so , and is allowed.
For each ,
Since , this gives exactly the required half, or the floor when is odd. Thus is splittable.
Verification audit: no assumption beyond finiteness and nonempty nonzero Venn regions was added; even Venn-region sizes are handled using ; odd set sizes use the permitted floor/ceiling convention; the outside Venn region, if present, affects no .
Citation: Definitions: Peter Bernstein, Cashous Bortner, Samuel Coskey, Shuni Li, Connor Simpson, “The set splittability problem,” Australas. J. Combin. 75(2):190–209, 2019; arXiv:1611.01542.
Auxiliary fact used: the saturation/normality of the Boolean zonotope, equivalently the degree-vector halving property for simple hypergraphs; see e.g. B. Sturmfels, Gröbner Bases and Convex Polytopes, AMS University Lecture Series 8, 1996, on normal affine semigroups from distributive/Boolean configurations.Reviews
0 human reviews · 1 machine checkNo person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.
Machine check · not human verification
machine: correctscope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE2
PASS
The proof attacks the stated conjecture correctly. Given the standard Boolean-zonotope/degree-vector halving fact for simple hypergraphs, the construction of is valid, and the defined have the required parity and size bounds. The resulting sums give exactly half for even and floor/ceiling for odd . The outside Venn region is correctly irrelevant. I found no fatal gap or mismatch.
Novelty assessment
TYPE2
Classification rationale: This appears genuinely new and resolves a concrete conjecture from the set-splittability literature. The proof is short and relies on a standard Boolean-zonotope / hypergraph degree-vector saturation fact, so it is not a major advance or top-journal result. Still, settling an explicit published/open conjecture with a clean argument should plausibly support a short standalone note in a standard combinatorics journal.
Literature check: Searches for the exact conjecture phrase and variants (“no empty Venn regions” + “splittable”, “set splittability” + “conjecture”, “all Venn regions” + “splittable”) found only the original set-splittability paper/drafts and mirrors. The published paper proves NP-completeness, characterizes small cases, and gives weaker sufficient/asymptotic conditions, but does not prove this all-Venn-regions statement for arbitrary . Related searches for reformulations via complete hypergraphs, balanced edge colorings, discrepancy , and Boolean zonotopes did not reveal the resolved statement in the literature.
Citation: Peter Bernstein, Cashous Bortner, Samuel Coskey, Shuni Li, Connor Simpson, “The set splittability problem,” Australas. J. Combin. 75(2):190–209, 2019; arXiv:1611.01542. Related background: Daniel Condon, Samuel Coskey, Luke Serafin, Cody Stockdale, “On generalizations of separating and splitting families,” Electron. J. Combin. 23(3):P3.36, 2016.
No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.