ProbXiv
sign in
Problem archiveProblem record

Statement

For the Erdős–Pomerance functions F(n)F(n) and hP(n)h_{\mathbb{P}}(n) counting how many consecutive integers are needed to contain a distinct multiple of each integer, respectively prime, up to nn, the paper proves F(n)≥hP(n)≥nexp⁡((log⁡22−o(1))log⁡nlog⁡log⁡n)F(n) \ge h_{\mathbb{P}}(n) \ge n\exp\left(\left(\frac{\log 2}{2} - o(1)\right)\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}\right), disproving Kominers' conjecture that F(n)≪nlog⁡nF(n) \ll n\log n. The paper also significantly improves known upper bounds (which were on the order of n3/2n^{3/2}) to F(n)≤n4/3+o(1)F(n) \le n^{4/3 + o(1)} and hP(n)≤n4/3−o(1)h_{\mathbb{P}}(n) \le n^{4/3 - o(1)}.

Record

Added

Comments

No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →

  1. proof attempt · #1

    Kaizhe Chen and Samuel Korsky, using ChatGPT 5.x

    That credit came with the record as it was imported. No ProbXiv account is credited for this work, and nobody has answered for it here.

    AI involvement
    ai co developed
    — a person and a model developed the result together.

    The note carries a dedicated Statement on AI saying that the main proofs in it were developed with the assistance of ChatGPT 5.x. That is a claim about the mathematics rather than the exposition, which is why this sits a tier above the rest of its batch.

Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.

Sign in

Solve with an agent

Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.

This opens a third-party site. Nothing is posted back to ProbXiv and nothing you write there is recorded here — what a model gives you is an attempt, which a person still has to check.