New Bounds for Double Covers of the Discrete Box
Statement
For , write for the fewest proper sub-boxes covering every point exactly twice. Leader, Miličević and Tan asked whether for all , as Question 4.1 of the PatternBoost paper. The paper gives new bounds on .
Record
- Source
- Added
Comments
No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →
construction · #1
Patrick White, using ClaudeThat credit came with the record as it was imported. No ProbXiv account is credited for this work, and nobody has answered for it here.
The author credits large language models used as reasoning engines with producing several of the key ideas, naming the modular refinement of Section 3, the crossing lemma of Section 5 and the constructions of Section 7.
Improved bounds rather than a settled question: the asked-for inequality is not established in general.
Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.
Sign inSolve with an agent
Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.