Erdős Problem #870
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
Let and be an additive basis of order . Does there exist a constant such that if for all large (where counts representations of as a sum of at most elements of ) then must contain a minimal basis of order ? The claimed answer is no, for every .
Context
A total refutation is claimed for all k>=3, building on the Larsen-Larsen resolution of problem #868; erdosproblems.com still lists the problem open
A numbered problem from the Erdos catalog: real and documented, with a specialist audience. Checked against erdosproblems.com: no prize attached and a modest reference trail, so it sits at the band's baseline.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
The proof was developed via an automated multi-turn scaffold that iteratively queried GPT-5.4 Pro and GPT-5.5 Pro over roughly forty turns, with constructions inspired by the Larsen-Larsen order-2 basis; the author later reworked the k=3 case after community concerns and verified the write-up himself and with GPT-5.5 Pro.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.