ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

Exponential Independence in Subcubic Graphs

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

exponential-independence-in-subcubic-graphs-2Probabilitymath.COmath.PRposed by Stéphane Bessy, Johannes Pardey, Dieter Rautenbachrecorded: open · 1 machine check, unexamined

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

Do trees of maximum degree at most 4 have exponentially independent sets of linear order?

Context

Candidate 2 of the open problems stated in "Exponential Independence in Subcubic Graphs", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: Reconstructed statement: for finite simple trees TT with maximum degree Δ(T)4\Delta(T)\le 4, does there exist an absolute constant c>0c>0 such that

    αe(T)cV(T)?\alpha_e(T)\ge c|V(T)|?

    Here SV(T)S\subseteq V(T) is exponentially independent if, for every uSu\in S,

    vS{u}21d(T,S{u})(u,v)<1,\sum_{v\in S\setminus\{u\}}2^{1-d_{(T,S\setminus\{u\})}(u,v)}<1,

    where d(T,X)(u,v)d_{(T,X)}(u,v) is the length of a shortest uu-vv path having no internal vertex in XX, and 2=02^{-\infty}=0. This is the standard formal meaning of “exponentially independent sets of linear order.”

    Result: Yes. In fact,

    αe(T)V(T)800\alpha_e(T)\ge \frac{|V(T)|}{800}

    for every finite tree TT with Δ(T)4\Delta(T)\le4.

    Proof. For a tree TT, define the ordinary energy

    E(T)=x,yV(T)xy21dT(x,y).E(T)=\sum_{\substack{x,y\in V(T)\\x\ne y}}2^{1-d_T(x,y)}.

    We first prove E(T)200V(T)E(T)\le 200|V(T)|.

    Root TT at a leaf. Then every vertex has at most three children. For a rooted tree RR with at most three children per vertex, root rr, put

    A(R)=xV(R)2dR(r,x).A(R)=\sum_{x\in V(R)}2^{-d_R(r,x)}.

    We prove by induction that

    E(R)200V(R)5A(R)2.E(R)\le 200|V(R)|-5A(R)^2.

    Let the child subtrees of rr be R1,,RmR_1,\dots,R_m, m3m\le3, and set Ai=A(Ri)A_i=A(R_i), ai=Ai/2a_i=A_i/2, s=ais=\sum a_i, p=ai2p=\sum a_i^2, q=i<jaiajq=\sum_{i<j}a_ia_j. Then

    A(R)=1+sA(R)=1+s

    and energy decomposition gives

    E(R)=iE(Ri)+2iAi+12ijAiAj.E(R)=\sum_i E(R_i)+2\sum_i A_i+\frac12\sum_{i\ne j}A_iA_j.

    Using induction,

    E(R)200(V(R)1)20p+4s+4q.E(R)\le 200(|V(R)|-1)-20p+4s+4q.

    Since m3m\le3, we have qpq\le p and ps2/3p\ge s^2/3. Hence

    5(1+s)2+4s+4q20p=5+14s15p+14q5+14sp5+14ss23152<200.5(1+s)^2+4s+4q-20p =5+14s-15p+14q \le 5+14s-p \le 5+14s-\frac{s^2}{3} \le 152<200.

    Therefore E(R)200V(R)5A(R)2E(R)\le 200|V(R)|-5A(R)^2. Thus E(T)200V(T)E(T)\le200|V(T)|.

    Now select each vertex independently with probability ρ=1/400\rho=1/400. For a selected vertex uu, let

    W(u)=vRvu21dT(u,v).W(u)=\sum_{\substack{v\in R\\v\ne u}}2^{1-d_T(u,v)}.

    Call uu bad if W(u)1W(u)\ge1, and delete all bad selected vertices. The remaining set is SS. Since 1{u bad}W(u)\mathbf 1_{\{u\text{ bad}\}}\le W(u),

    ESρnρ2E(T)n400200n4002=n800.\mathbb E|S| \ge \rho n-\rho^2E(T) \ge \frac{n}{400}-\frac{200n}{400^2} =\frac{n}{800}.

    So some outcome has Sn/800|S|\ge n/800.

    For every uSu\in S,

    vS{u}21dT(u,v)<1.\sum_{v\in S\setminus\{u\}}2^{1-d_T(u,v)}<1.

    Because d(T,S{u})(u,v)dT(u,v)d_{(T,S\setminus\{u\})}(u,v)\ge d_T(u,v), the exponential-independence weight is no larger than this ordinary sum. Hence SS is exponentially independent.

    Thus trees of maximum degree at most 44 do have exponentially independent sets of linear order.

    Citation: No known prior resolution is used here. The problem statement is from Bessy, Pardey, and Rautenbach, “Exponential Independence in Subcubic Graphs,” Conclusion section.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1

      PASS

      The proof attacks the correct statement and is mathematically sound. The energy induction correctly gives E(T)=O(V(T))E(T)=O(|V(T)|) for maximum-degree-4 trees rooted at a leaf, and the random thinning argument then yields an exponentially independent set of size at least V(T)/800|V(T)|/800. The final comparison with the modified exponential-independence distance is valid since that distance is never shorter than ordinary tree distance.

      There is a minor notational ambiguity where RR in the random step should denote the random selected set, but the intended argument is clear and complete.

      Novelty assessment

      TYPE1

      Classification rationale: Genuinely new as far as I could determine, but the contribution appears quite small: it gives a short elementary probabilistic/energy proof with a poor absolute constant for a narrow open question. It resolves a stated problem, but likely as a brief note or part of a larger paper rather than a standalone standard-journal article.

      Literature check: I found the source problem in Bessy–Pardey–Rautenbach, arXiv:2010.00886, “Exponential Independence in Subcubic Graphs.” Searches of arXiv for “exponential independence” with “trees,” “maximum degree 4,” and “exponentially independent” returned only the original paper and the earlier foundational Jäger–Rautenbach paper. Broader web/database searches via arXiv, Google/Bing/DuckDuckGo attempts, Semantic Scholar/OpenAlex/Crossref/DOAJ-style searches did not reveal any later paper proving that trees of maximum degree at most 4 have exponentially independent sets of linear order, nor any stronger general theorem implying it. Some services were inaccessible/rate-limited, but no contrary reference surfaced.

      Citation: Stéphane Bessy, Johannes Pardey, Dieter Rautenbach, “Exponential Independence in Subcubic Graphs,” arXiv:2010.00886.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.