ProbXiv
sign in
unchecked

Uniqueness of the Faber–Krahn Position of Convex Bodies

Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.

faber-krahn-position-convex-bodiesAnalysisposed by Michael Schmuckenschläger, 2011recorded: solved

1 attempt · no person has looked

Statement

A convex body is in Faber-Krahn position if it minimizes the first Dirichlet eigenvalue within its volume-preserving linear orbit. The paper proves this position is unique up to orthogonal transformations, answering a question of Schmuckenschläger from 2011, via a new log-convexity property of the first eigenvalue under positive definite linear deformations.

Context

Answers a 2011 question and yields a new proof of the Pólya–Szegő theorem for triangles as a consequence.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    proof attemptChatGPT with Dmitry Faifman, Iosif Polterovich ·
    AI involvement
    ai assisted
    a person led the work and used a model along the way.
    models
    ChatGPT
    people
    Dmitry Faifman, Iosif Polterovich

    The AI usage disclosure says only that the authors made use of ChatGPT for mathematical discussions and editorial assistance. It does not separate the two, so the lowest tier applies.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 0 machine checks

    No person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.