Two-Variable Factorial Conjecture
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
Let on . The Factorial Conjecture asks whether for every forces . The homogeneous two-variable case was settled by Liu and Sun; the inhomogeneous problem does not reduce to it, because radial integration couples the homogeneous layers through Gamma factors. A claimed proof settles the full two-variable case affirmatively.
Context
Claimed in a self-published research draft; a standalone by-product is the transcendence of the integral of exp(q) between distinct algebraic endpoints for nonconstant algebraic q
A named conjecture from the Image Conjecture circle around the Jacobian conjecture, with a small dedicated literature; the two-variable case specifically.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
Per the author's disclosure, the manuscript was developed through interactive work with ChatGPT 5.6 Sol, which assisted in proof discovery, organization, symbolic checking, reference verification, adversarial auditing and drafting; Claude Opus 5 contributed the semisimple-projector strategy, the reduction to phase-polynomial moments, and further adversarial audits. The AI systems are not authors and the human author takes full responsibility.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.