ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

Figures of Constant Width on a Chessboard

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

figures-of-constant-width-on-a-chessboard-3Combinatoricsmath.COposed by Janko Hernández, Leonel Robertrecorded: open · 1 machine check, unexamined

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

W(n,k,4)=0 if either (i) n<14 or (ii) n=14,k<14.

Context

Candidate 3 of the open problems stated in "Figures of Constant Width on a Chessboard", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt →

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    — the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: Reconstructed statement: for Bn={0,…,n−1}2B_n=\{0,\dots,n-1\}^2, a figure F⊆BnF\subseteq B_n has constant width ww if every row, column, and ordinary diagonal r+c=sr+c=s, r−c=dr-c=d meets FF in either 00 or ww cells. W(n,k,w)W(n,k,w) counts such figures with ∣F∣=kw|F|=kw. Conjecture 3 says W(n,k,4)=0W(n,k,4)=0 if n<14n<14, or if n=14n=14 and k<14k<14.

    Result: The conjecture is false. Define F⊆B12F\subseteq B_{12} by rows

    A0={3,4,7,8},A1={2,3,8,9},A2={1,5,6,10},A3={0,1,10,11},A4={0,5,6,11},A5={2,4,7,9},A6={2,4,7,9},A7={0,5,6,11},A8={0,1,10,11},A9={1,5,6,10},A10={2,3,8,9},A11={3,4,7,8}.\begin{aligned} A_0&=\{3,4,7,8\},&A_1&=\{2,3,8,9\},\\ A_2&=\{1,5,6,10\},&A_3&=\{0,1,10,11\},\\ A_4&=\{0,5,6,11\},&A_5&=\{2,4,7,9\},\\ A_6&=\{2,4,7,9\},&A_7&=\{0,5,6,11\},\\ A_8&=\{0,1,10,11\},&A_9&=\{1,5,6,10\},\\ A_{10}&=\{2,3,8,9\},&A_{11}&=\{3,4,7,8\}. \end{aligned}

    Let F={(r,c):c∈Ar}F=\{(r,c):c\in A_r\}. Every row has 44 cells, and each column 0,…,110,\dots,11 also occurs exactly 44 times. The occupied sum-diagonals are

    3,4,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,18,19,3,4,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,18,19,

    each with multiplicity 44. The occupied difference-diagonals are

    −8,−7,−4,−3,−2,−1,1,2,3,4,7,8,-8,-7,-4,-3,-2,-1,1,2,3,4,7,8,

    each with multiplicity 44. Hence every nonempty row, column, and diagonal has exactly 44 cells.

    Thus ∣F∣=48=12⋅4|F|=48=12\cdot4, so W(12,12,4)>0W(12,12,4)>0. Since 12<1412<14, this directly contradicts the conjectured vanishing.

    Citation: Original conjecture and definitions: Janko Hernández and Leonel Robert, “Figures of Constant Width on a Chessboard,” American Mathematical Monthly 112 (2005), 42–50. The counterexample above is self-contained.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification KNOWN

      PASS

      The proposed 12×1212\times 12 set is a valid counterexample to the stated conjecture. Each row has 4 cells, each column count is 4, and the listed sum- and difference-diagonal counts are all exactly 4 on the occupied diagonals and 0 otherwise. Hence it is a constant-width-4 figure with ∣F∣=48=12⋅4|F|=48=12\cdot4, so W(12,12,4)>0W(12,12,4)>0. Since 12<1412<14, this directly disproves Conjecture 3 as stated. I found no evidence here that this specific counterexample is already known.

      Novelty assessment

      KNOWN

      Classification rationale: The accepted resolution is not new. An online update by Leonel Robert reports François Glineur’s computation finding a figure of type (12,12,4)(12,12,4), exactly giving W(12,12,4)>0W(12,12,4)>0 and disproving the claimed n<14n<14 vanishing.

      Literature check: A search of the original title and related terms led to the original authors’ companion webpages. The page “More on figures of constant width on a chessboard” states that for w=4w=4, type (n,n,w)(n,n,w) figures exist for n=12,14,…,20n=12,14,\ldots,20, and explicitly says: “There is only one figure of type (12,12,4).” This is the same existence result as the proposed counterexample.

      Citation: Leonel Robert, “More on figures of constant width on a chessboard,” reporting findings of François Glineur, https://userweb.ucs.louisiana.edu/~C00254569/cwfiguresweb2/report-figures.html.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.