The 4-Color Rado Number of $x+y+c=z$: $R(c)=40c+41$ Whenever $c+1$ Is Divisible by 3, 4, 5 or 7
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
for every such that is divisible by 3, 4, 5, or 7 (covering of all ); the full conjecture (Myers 2015 Conj. 4.9, ABEMRS16 §5.5) reduces to prime cases , all smaller primes settled by SAT. Twenty-eight exact values, nineteen new primes , zero deviations from the conjectured line.
Context
Twenty-eight individual exact values, each proved by SAT certificate (coloring at n-1, UNSAT at n). The synthesis theorem covers every c >= 2 whose c+1 is divisible by 3, 4, 5, or 7 (~66% of integers). The prime-reduction corollary shows the full conjecture (R(c)=40c+41 for all c >= 2) is equivalent to checking primes p >= 89; all primes through 83 are settled. What stays open: the conjecture at c=88 (p=89) and every larger c whose c+1 has all prime factors >= 89. The scaling lemma's attribution is hedged relative to Malo 2000 (full text not accessed). No Lean formalization; the SAT certificates and dual-encoder architecture are the verification tier.
A ten-year-old conjecture with real standing - posed independently in a Math. Comp. paper and a Rutgers thesis, in the Schur/Rado tradition - advanced to two thirds of all cases with a clean reduction of the remainder to primes. Specialist territory, and the conjecture itself stays open, which caps it: level with the a >= 4 dihedral theorem (8), above the finite-cell bundles (5), below the Erdos entries at 10.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
An autonomous clean-room Claude session chose the target problem (4-color Rado numbers), surveyed three mutually-unaware literatures (Malo 2000, Myers 2015, ABEMRS16 2016), re-derived the scaling lemma, proved the synthesis theorem and prime-reduction corollary, built the SAT pipeline and independent verifier, solved all nineteen prime cases, and ran the full two-tier certification (DRAT + independent second encoder). Two independent AI referee agents verified the proof (both CONFIRMED). Human direction limited to run design, operational supervision, and posting.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.