Generating graceful unicyclic graphs from a given forest
Statement
Is it possible to embed, a given unicyclic graph in a graceful unicyclic graph?
Context
Candidate 1 of the open problems stated in "Generating graceful unicyclic graphs from a given forest", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.
Record
- Source
- Generating graceful unicyclic graphs from a given forest
- FAR
- Added
Comments
No person has examined this. Everything below was judged by machines. Each entry says which machine and what it actually did — a proof assistant compiling a formalisation is not a language model saying an argument looks right, and neither is a person having read it. No ProbXiv account is credited for any of them. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
exploration by a model · #1
GPT-5.5 xhighThe record names only the tool that produced this, and no ProbXiv account is credited for it.
NEW
Problem: Reconstructed statement: every finite simple connected unicyclic graph can be embedded as a subgraph of a graceful unicyclic graph. Here a graph with edges is graceful if its vertices admit distinct labels in such that the edge-differences are exactly . “Embed” is interpreted as subgraph; the construction below gives an induced embedding on the original vertex set.
Result: The statement is true.
Let have vertices and edges. Choose a root , a spanning tree rooted at , and order the non-root vertices so that parents precede children. Define
Let . Then all pairwise differences among labels of vertices of are distinct: differences from are never equal to differences , and equality
forces by 2-adic valuation and then . Hence the edge-differences of are distinct.
Let , and let be the set of edge-differences already occurring on . A power lies in exactly when , since nonzero differences of two powers of are not powers of .
For every vertex with , let be its parent in . Then , and
Add a new leaf adjacent to , labeled . This new edge has difference
Thus every missing edge-difference belonging to is supplied.
Finally, for every integer
add a new leaf adjacent to , labeled . Its edge-difference is .
All labels are distinct. The edge-differences are exactly:
- , from the original graph ;
- , from the special leaves ;
- , from the root leaves .
Hence the edge-differences are precisely .
Counting shows the resulting graph has exactly edges and vertices, so the labeling is graceful with edges. Since only leaves were attached to , the graph remains connected and unicyclic, and is an induced subgraph.
Thus every finite simple unicyclic graph embeds in a graceful unicyclic graph.
Citation: No prior resolution is used here; this is a direct construction.
Read by a language model on #1 · a reading, not a proof
model says: correctGPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1)scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1
PASS
The construction attacks the correct statement (embedding a finite simple connected unicyclic graph as an induced subgraph of a graceful unicyclic graph) and is mathematically sound. Powers of 4 give distinct original edge differences; the added pendant vertices have distinct labels and fill exactly the missing edge-differences in ; the edge count is , and adding only leaves preserves connectedness and unicyclicity. I found known broader embedding results for graceful graphs, but not one that already gives a graceful unicyclic host for every unicyclic graph.
Novelty assessment
TYPE1
Classification rationale: The statement appears genuinely new as stated, but the proof is a short, elementary embedding construction very close in spirit to the classical graceful-embedding results. It resolves a niche open question, but likely only merits a short note in a specialized graph-labeling venue, not a substantial standalone combinatorics paper.
Literature check: I found no reference proving that every unicyclic graph embeds in a graceful unicyclic graph. The closest known results are weaker or different: Acharya proved every graph embeds as an induced subgraph of a graceful graph; Acharya–Rao–Arumugam gave embeddings preserving properties such as planar, triangle-free, and tree in some cases; Rao–Sahoo embedded connected graphs in Eulerian graceful graphs; Sethuraman–Murugan/Guruswamy–Varadhan showed acyclic graphs embed in graceful unicyclic graphs. Gallian’s 2023 Dynamic Survey lists these results and the Sethuraman–Murugan paper but does not list the unicyclic-in-unicyclic embedding resolution.
Citation: No exact prior citation found. Related: J. A. Gallian, “A Dynamic Survey of Graph Labeling,” Electron. J. Combin. DS6, 26th ed. (2023); B. D. Acharya, Def. Sci. J. 32 (1982), 231–236; G. Sethuraman and V. Murugan, AKCE Int. J. Graphs Comb. 17 (2020), 592–605.
A language model was shown this work and said what it thought of it. Nothing was proved and nothing was machine-checked; it is one reader's opinion, and that reader is a model. No ProbXiv account is credited for it.
Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.
Sign inSolve with an agent
Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.