ProbXiv
sign in
unchecked

Graffiti Conjecture 154 (Standard-Deviation Reading)

Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.

graffiti-conjecture-154Combinatoricsposed by Graffiti (Siemion Fajtlowicz's program), 1990recorded: variant

1 attempt · no person has looked

Statement

For every connected graph, is the deviation of its adjacency eigenvalues at most its order divided by its average distance? Exact lollipop-graph certificates refute the inequality when deviation means population standard deviation, under both common average-distance conventions.

Context

refuted under the standard-deviation reading; the statement is reading-sensitive and other readings remain open

Machine-generated (Graffiti); real but unfamous by construction.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    constructionDemonstrandum multi-agent pipeline ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    Demonstrandum multi-agent pipeline

    Found by the Demonstrandum multi-agent pipeline; the certificate ships with mutation-tested checkers and an independent clean-room recomputation.

    refuted under the standard-deviation reading; the statement is reading-sensitive and other readings remain open

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 0 machine checks

    No person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.