Remodeling for the Affine Binary Dihedral Calabi–Yau Threefold
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
The paper proves a closed-string remodeling statement for the affine binary dihedral Calabi–Yau orbifold threefold, a target outside the toric setting of the Bouchard–Klemm–Mariño–Pasquetti remodeling conjecture, replacing the toric mirror curve by a type- logarithmic Toda curve and the topological recursion by its -equivariant form.
Context
A variant rather than the BKMP conjecture itself: the target lies outside the toric setting the conjecture addresses.
Extends the remodeling correspondence beyond the toric case the original conjecture covers.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
The paper states plainly that the mathematics of the paper was generated by a Rethlas-based system under a human-provided strategy and initial input, using an orchestrator the authors built to spawn agents.
A variant rather than the BKMP conjecture itself: the target lies outside the toric setting the conjecture addresses.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.