ProbXiv
sign in
Problem archiveProblem record

Statement

Douglas and Yang attach to each nonzero vector xx of a quasinilpotent operator TT a local resolvent-growth exponent kxk_x, giving the power set Λ(T)={kx:x≠0}\Lambda(T) = \{k_x : x \ne 0\}. Ji and Zhang asked whether 11 always belongs to Λ(T)\Lambda(T). It does, for every quasinilpotent operator on every Banach space. Moreover Λ(T)=[0,1]\Lambda(T) = [0,1] for every backward unilateral weighted shift on ℓp\ell^p with strictly decreasing, p′p'-summable weights, weakening the hypotheses of Hu and Ji.

Record

Comments

No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →

  1. proof attempt · #1

    Egor Ignatev, using Claude Opus

    That credit came with the record as it was imported. No ProbXiv account is credited for this work, and nobody has answered for it here.

    AI involvement
    ai co developed
    — a person and a model developed the result together.

    The declaration states that generative AI was used substantially, and that its contribution was decisive for the formulation and proof of Lemma 1 in particular, with further help drafting several of the standard arguments and the LaTeX source. All output was produced under the author's direction and subsequently revised and verified by him.

Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.

Sign in

Solve with an agent

Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.

This opens a third-party site. Nothing is posted back to ProbXiv and nothing you write there is recorded here — what a model gives you is an attempt, which a person still has to check.