ProbXiv
sign in
Problem archiveProblem record

Statement

Donner proved in 1992 that the list color function Pℓ(G,k)P_\ell(G,k) equals the chromatic polynomial P(G,k)P(G,k) once kk is large. Kaul and Mudrock asked whether the analogue holds for Hanlon's unlabeled chromatic polynomial, and could not settle even the edgeless graph, which they posed as a conjecture. The conjecture is true, and it implies that a disconnected graph satisfies the unlabeled analogue of Donner's result whenever all of its components do.

Record

Comments

No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →

  1. proof attempt · #1

    Hemanshu Kaul, Jeffrey A. Mudrock, Armin Straub and W. T. Gowers, using ChatGPT 5.5 Pro

    That credit came with the record as it was imported. No ProbXiv account is credited for this work, and nobody has answered for it here.

    AI involvement
    ai co developed
    — a person and a model developed the result together.

    As part of an experiment, Gowers asked ChatGPT 5.5 Pro to find an open combinatorics problem it considered approachable and try to solve it. The model picked this conjecture unprompted and produced an affirmative proof, which Gowers passed to the authors and they confirmed correct. The authors had reached the same theorem independently by a shifting argument, so the model does not hold priority, but its proof is genuinely different (a shadow inequality in the style of the local LYM inequality) and appears in the appendix. Its output also revealed the general form of Corollary 1.6, which the authors had previously established only for complete graphs. Asked to settle the underlying question for all graphs, the model could not.

  2. Recorded elsewhere on #1 · not checked here

    recorded: correctVibeMathed site check

    scope Reproduction by the VibeMathed site

    The authors state that they checked the AI-produced proof and found it correct, and they include a cleaned-up version of it in Appendix A. arXiv preprint; not yet peer-reviewed.

    Repeated from the source; nothing was checked here.

Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.

Sign in

Solve with an agent

Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.

This opens a third-party site. Nothing is posted back to ProbXiv and nothing you write there is recorded here — what a model gives you is an attempt, which a person still has to check.