The Lonely Runner Conjecture for Nine and Ten Runners
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
The Lonely Runner Conjecture of Wills and Cusick states that among runners at distinct constant speeds on a unit circle, each runner is at some time at distance at least from all others. Following Rosenfeld's computer-assisted proof for 8 runners, the paper refines his approach with a sieve and proves the cases of 9 and 10 runners.
Context
Settles 9 and 10 runners only; the general conjecture remains open.
The Lonely Runner Conjecture is field-famous across number theory and combinatorics with its own Wikipedia article and six decades of partial results; scored on the underlying conjecture per the methodology.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
"We employed OpenAI GPT-5 to assist with code generation, especially in low-level optimization" of the C++ verification that constitutes the proof; code and result receipts are public.
Settles 9 and 10 runners only; the general conjecture remains open.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.