ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

On strongly walk regular graphs, triple sum sets and their codes

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

on-strongly-walk-regular-graphs-triple-sum-sets-and-their-codes-3Number Theorymath.NTmath.RTposed by Michael Kiermaier, Sascha Kurz, Patrick Solé, Michael Stoll, Alfred Wassermannrecorded: open · 1 machine check, unexamined

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

Let C be a projective [n,k]_q three-weight code with non-zero weights w_1 < w_2 < w_3 satisfying w_1 + w_2 + w_3 = 3(1-1/q)n. Then w_2 = (1-1/q)n. Moreover, w_1 = w_2 - t and w_3 = w_2 + t, where t is a power of the characteristic p of F_q.

Context

Candidate 3 of the open problems stated in "On strongly walk regular graphs, triple sum sets and their codes", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: The conjecture is formalized as follows. Let q=phq=p^h be a prime power, and let CFqnC\le \mathbb F_q^n be a kk-dimensional linear code. “Projective” means that in a generator matrix no column is zero and no two columns are proportional, equivalently d(C)3d(C^\perp)\ge 3. Suppose the nonzero Hamming weights of CC are exactly

    w1<w2<w3w_1<w_2<w_3

    and

    w1+w2+w3=3(11/q)n.w_1+w_2+w_3=3(1-1/q)n.

    The conjecture asserts that

    w2=(11/q)nw_2=(1-1/q)n

    and that w1=w2t, w3=w2+tw_1=w_2-t,\ w_3=w_2+t, where tt is a power of the characteristic pp.

    This is the standard coding-theoretic reading of the supplied Conjecture 3.4.

    Result: The conjecture is false.

    Work over F3\mathbb F_3, and let CC be the row span of

    G=(000011101110001012012).G=\begin{pmatrix} 0&0&0&0&1&1&1\\ 0&1&1&1&0&0&0\\ 1&0&1&2&0&1&2 \end{pmatrix}.

    The columns are

    (0,0,1),(0,1,0),(0,1,1),(0,1,2),(1,0,0),(1,0,1),(1,0,2),(0,0,1),(0,1,0),(0,1,1),(0,1,2),(1,0,0),(1,0,1),(1,0,2),

    which are seven distinct projective points in PG(2,3)\mathrm{PG}(2,3). Hence no two columns are proportional and none is zero. Also GG contains the standard basis columns, so rankG=3\operatorname{rank}G=3. Thus CC is a projective [7,3]3[7,3]_3 code.

    For a message vector (a,b,c)F33(a,b,c)\in\mathbb F_3^3,

    (a,b,c)G=(c, b, b+c, b+2c, a, a+c, a+2c).(a,b,c)G=(c,\ b,\ b+c,\ b+2c,\ a,\ a+c,\ a+2c).

    If c0c\ne0, then among b,b+c,b+2cb,b+c,b+2c exactly one entry is zero, and among a,a+c,a+2ca,a+c,a+2c exactly one entry is zero, while c0c\ne0. Hence the weight is 55.

    If c=0c=0, then

    (a,b,0)G=(0,b,b,b,a,a,a).(a,b,0)G=(0,b,b,b,a,a,a).

    If exactly one of a,ba,b is nonzero, the weight is 33. If both a,ba,b are nonzero, the weight is 66.

    Therefore the nonzero weights are exactly

    w1=3,w2=5,w3=6.w_1=3,\qquad w_2=5,\qquad w_3=6.

    They satisfy the conjecture’s hypothesis:

    w1+w2+w3=3+5+6=14=3(113)7.w_1+w_2+w_3=3+5+6=14 =3\left(1-\frac13\right)7.

    But the asserted conclusion would require

    w2=(113)7=143,w_2=\left(1-\frac13\right)7=\frac{14}{3},

    which is impossible and in particular not equal to 55. Also the weights are not symmetric about w2w_2, since 53=25-3=2 but 65=16-5=1.

    Thus Conjecture 3.4 is disproved.

    The defect is an omitted integrality/divisibility condition: the hypothesis does not force (11/q)n(1-1/q)n to be integral when q=3q=3. A natural repair would at least require qnq\mid n, but the conjecture as stated is false.

    Verification audit: all hypotheses are satisfied by the displayed projective [7,3]3[7,3]_3 code; the weight set is computed exhaustively for all nonzero messages; the required weight-sum identity holds exactly; and the stated conclusion fails exactly.

    Citation: Counterexample constructed above. Source of the conjecture: Kiermaier–Kurz–Solé–Stoll–Wassermann, “On strongly walk regular graphs, triple sum sets and their codes,” arXiv:2012.06160 / Designs, Codes and Cryptography 91 (2023).

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1

      PASS

      The counterexample is valid. The displayed generator matrix has rank 3 and nonzero, pairwise non-proportional columns, so it gives a projective [7,3]3[7,3]_3 code. The weight computation is exhaustive and correct: the nonzero weights are exactly 3,5,63,5,6. These satisfy

      3+5+6=14=3(11/3)7,3+5+6=14=3(1-1/3)7,

      but the conjectured conclusion would require w2=(11/3)7=14/35w_2=(1-1/3)7=14/3\neq 5. Thus the stated conjecture is rigorously disproved.

      Novelty assessment

      TYPE1

      Classification rationale: The counterexample is valid but very small and elementary: a projective ternary [7,3]3[7,3]_3 code from the union of two lines in PG(2,3)\mathrm{PG}(2,3), with weights 3,5,63,5,6. It disproves the conjecture as stated only because the conjecture omitted an integrality/divisibility condition. This is mathematically useful as a correction/erratum, but not substantial enough for a standalone combinatorics paper.

      Literature check: I found no evidence that this exact counterexample or an explicit disproof of Conjecture 3.4 has appeared after the Kiermaier–Kurz–Solé–Stoll–Wassermann paper. Searches targeted the conjecture wording, the weight identity w1+w2+w3=3(11/q)nw_1+w_2+w_3=3(1-1/q)n, the paper title, “projective three-weight code”, “strongly walk regular graphs”, and the specific ternary [7,3][7,3] weight set 3,5,63,5,6, across arXiv/DOI metadata, citation-style sources, web search endpoints, GitHub/issues, and related open web sources. No prior resolution surfaced. The underlying code geometry is standard, but I did not find it cited as a counterexample to this conjecture.

      Citation: Kiermaier, Kurz, Solé, Stoll, Wassermann, “On strongly walk regular graphs, triple sum sets and their codes,” Designs, Codes and Cryptography 91 (2023), arXiv:2012.06160.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.