ProbXiv
sign in
unchecked

Tight Bound for Online Vertex Cover under Edge Arrivals

Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.

online-vertex-cover-edge-arrivalsAlgorithms & optimizationposer not recordedrecorded: solved

1 attempt · no person has looked

Statement

What is the optimal competitive ratio for online vertex cover when edges arrive one at a time? The paper proves a tight factor-2 lower bound via a reduction in the blueprint framework of Assadi, Jiang and Xiang, closing the gap left by prior work.

Context

An established open question of the online-algorithms community; tight bounds for vertex cover under edge arrivals resisted a line of prior work.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    proof attemptGPT-5.6 Sol with Zhihao Gavin Tang ·
    AI involvement
    ai co developed
    a person and a model developed the result together.
    models
    GPT-5.6 Sol
    people
    Zhihao Gavin Tang

    The authors had partial progress and suggested the Assadi-Jiang-Xiang blueprint might apply; "prompted by this suggestion, OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol formulated the reduction yielding the tight factor-2 lower bound proved in this paper and assisted with drafting the manuscript." The authors independently verified the reduction, proof and citations.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 0 machine checks

    No person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.