ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

Pattern-Avoiding Polytopes

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

pattern-avoiding-polytopes-3Combinatoricsmath.COposed by Robert Davis, Bruce Saganrecorded: open · 1 machine check, unexamined

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

Is there a nice combinatorial proof for the number of interior lattice points of Pn(132,312)P_{n}(132,312) ?

Context

Candidate 3 of the open problems stated in "Pattern-Avoiding Polytopes", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: For n1n\ge1, let

    Pn(132,312)=conv{(σ1,,σn):σSn(132,312)}Rn,P_n(132,312)=\operatorname{conv}\{(\sigma_1,\ldots,\sigma_n):\sigma\in\mathfrak S_n(132,312)\}\subset \mathbb R^n,

    where Sn(132,312)\mathfrak S_n(132,312) denotes permutations avoiding both patterns 132132 and 312312. The paper’s question is subjective as written (“nice combinatorial proof”), so I formalize it as: give a combinatorial proof, preferably bijective, that

    #(Pn(132,312)Zn)=!(n1),\#\bigl(P_n(132,312)^\circ\cap \mathbb Z^n\bigr)=! (n-1),

    the number of derangements of [n1][n-1]. Here PP^\circ is relative interior.

    Result: Let N=n1N=n-1. Davis--Sagan’s parallelotope description gives

    Pn(132,312)=(1,2,,n)+j=1N[0,1]vj,vj=i=1j(eiej+1).P_n(132,312)=(1,2,\ldots,n)+\sum_{j=1}^{N}[0,1]v_j, \qquad v_j=\sum_{i=1}^j(e_i-e_{j+1}).

    Apply the unimodular map AA with Aij=1A_{ij}=-1 for iji\le j and 00 otherwise. Then

    Avj=wj=i=1j+1(i1)ei.Av_j=w_j=\sum_{i=1}^{j+1}(i-1)e_i.

    Thus interior lattice points of Pn(132,312)P_n(132,312) are in bijection with lattice points

    z=j=1Ntjwj,0<tj<1.z=\sum_{j=1}^{N}t_jw_j,\qquad 0<t_j<1.

    Write z=(0,a1,,aN)z=(0,a_1,\ldots,a_N). Since the (k+1)(k+1)-st coordinate is

    ak=k(tk+tk+1++tN),a_k=k(t_k+t_{k+1}+\cdots+t_N),

    with aN+1=0a_{N+1}=0, we have

    tk=akkak+1k+1.t_k=\frac{a_k}{k}-\frac{a_{k+1}}{k+1}.

    For the half-open parallelepiped 0tk<10\le t_k<1, reducing aka_k modulo kk gives a bijection with inversion sequences

    r=(r1,,rN),0rk<k.r=(r_1,\ldots,r_N),\qquad 0\le r_k<k.

    Indeed, given ak+1a_{k+1}, the interval

    [kak+1k+1,kak+1k+1+k)\left[\frac{k a_{k+1}}{k+1},\,\frac{k a_{k+1}}{k+1}+k\right)

    contains exactly one integer in each residue class modulo kk.

    Now tk=0t_k=0 iff

    akk=ak+1k+1.\frac{a_k}{k}=\frac{a_{k+1}}{k+1}.

    Because gcd(k,k+1)=1\gcd(k,k+1)=1, this happens iff rk=rk+1=0r_k=r_{k+1}=0, where we set rN+1=0r_{N+1}=0. Therefore interior lattice points are bijective with inversion sequences

    0rk<k0\le r_k<k

    having no adjacent zeroes in

    (r1,r2,,rN,rN+1),rN+1=0.(r_1,r_2,\ldots,r_N,r_{N+1}),\qquad r_{N+1}=0.

    Let ANA_N be the number of such sequences. Then A0=1A_0=1, A1=0A_1=0, and for N2N\ge2:

    • choose rN{1,,N1}r_N\in\{1,\ldots,N-1\};
    • either (r1,,rN1)(r_1,\ldots,r_{N-1}) is a valid sequence of length N1N-1, or rN1=0r_{N-1}=0 and (r1,,rN2)(r_1,\ldots,r_{N-2}) is valid of length N2N-2.

    Hence

    AN=(N1)(AN1+AN2),A_N=(N-1)(A_{N-1}+A_{N-2}),

    with A0=1,A1=0A_0=1,A_1=0. This is the standard derangement recurrence, so

    AN=!N.A_N=!N.

    Thus

    #(Pn(132,312)Zn)=!(n1).\#\bigl(P_n(132,312)^\circ\cap\mathbb Z^n\bigr)=!(n-1).

    Moreover, the recurrence gives an explicit recursive bijection to derangements: if the valid sequence ends in rN=i0r_N=i\neq0, then either append NN into the cycle of ii of a derangement of [N1][N-1], or, if the previous entry is 00, add the transposition (iN)(i\,N) to a derangement of the remaining N2N-2 elements. This matches exactly the usual derangement recurrence.

    Citation: Davis--Sagan, Pattern-Avoiding Polytopes, arXiv:1609.01782, for the definition of Pn(132,312)P_n(132,312), its parallelotope description, and the original open question. The residue/inversion-sequence bijective proof above supplies the requested combinatorial explanation.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1

      PASS

      The proof attacks the correct statement and is mathematically sound. The unimodular change of coordinates, residue parametrization of the half-open parallelepiped, and translation of tk>0t_k>0 into “no adjacent zeros” are correct. The resulting recurrence

      AN=(N1)(AN1+AN2),A0=1, A1=0A_N=(N-1)(A_{N-1}+A_{N-2}),\quad A_0=1,\ A_1=0

      matches derangements, giving the desired combinatorial count. I found no fatal gap; the final recursive bijection sketch is terse but the counting proof itself is complete.

      Novelty assessment

      TYPE1

      Classification rationale: The new contribution appears to be a short combinatorial proof/bijection for an enumeration already proved by Davis–Sagan via Ehrhart reciprocity. It is neat and useful, but it follows from their parallelotope description plus an elementary residue/inversion-sequence encoding and the standard derangement recurrence. This is too small for a standalone combinatorics paper.

      Literature check: I found the count itself in Davis–Sagan, Corollary 3.10, followed immediately by Question 3.11 asking for a natural bijection. Searches for the exact question, Pn(132,312)P_n(132,312), “interior lattice points” with “132,312” and “derangements,” and the inversion-sequence/no-adjacent-zero formulation did not reveal a published bijection. The main later related paper found is on cc-Birkhoff polytopes/Cambrian lattices, addressing a different Davis–Sagan question. OEIS A000166 records the Davis–Sagan count but not this bijective explanation.

      Citation: Robert Davis and Bruce Sagan, “Pattern-Avoiding Polytopes,” European J. Combin. 74 (2018), 48–84, Proposition 3.9, Corollary 3.10, Question 3.11.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.