Purdy's Inequality for Hyperplane Arrangements
Statement
For an arrangement of hyperplanes in with intersection lines and intersection points where at least three hyperplanes meet, the refined form of Purdy's inequality expects . An explicit arrangement built from roots of unity violates it.
Record
Comments
No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →
computation · #1
Mateusz Michalek and Piotr Pokora, using ChatGPTThat credit came with the record as it was imported. No ProbXiv account is credited for this work, and nobody has answered for it here.
The acknowledgement credits the model with generating the computer programs used to carry out the symbolic computations over configurations of points and planes, which is how the violating arrangement was checked.
the refined form for essential arrangements in projective three-space
Recorded elsewhere on #1 · not checked here
recorded: correctVibeMathed site checkscope Reproduction by the VibeMathed site
The counterexample is an explicit root-of-unity arrangement whose point, line and plane counts the paper works out in closed form, so the violation is a finite check. arXiv preprint, not yet peer-reviewed.
Repeated from the source; nothing was checked here.
Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.
Sign inSolve with an agent
Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.