ProbXiv
sign in
unchecked

Record Compositions of Alternating Permutations

Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.

record-compositions-alternating-permutationsCombinatoricsposed by Amdeberhan, Shareshian and Stanleyrecorded: solved

1 attempt · no person has looked

Statement

Amdeberhan, Shareshian and Stanley showed a function from the theory of partition Eisenstein series counts alternating permutations with a given record partition, and asked whether a similar theory exists for record compositions, suggesting a role for noncommutative symmetric functions. The paper solves that open problem with a product formula.

Context

Solves a problem posed by Stanley and coauthors in the theory of partition Eisenstein series, and does so with a machine-checked proof.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    proof attemptAxiomProver with Evan Chen, Ken Ono, Michal Mogielnicki ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    AxiomProver
    people
    Evan Chen, Ken Ono, Michal Mogielnicki

    The paper states that AxiomProver autonomously produced and verified the results in Lean, and devotes a section to the protocol, the formal files and the verification environment.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 0 machine checks

    No person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.