ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

Written on the Wall II, Graph Conjecture 217

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

wowii-graph-conjecture-217Combinatoricsposed by Written on the Wall II (automated conjecturing)recorded: candidate

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

VibeMathed records no statement for this problem. See formal-conjectures PR #4668 - Mark WOWII Graph Conjecture 217 solved for the original.

Context

Machine-generated (Written on the Wall II); real but unfamous by construction.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt →

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    computationClaude Opus 5 (with Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT-5.3 Codex Spark, Grok 4.5) ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    — the result was found by a model.
    models
    Claude Opus 5 (with Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT-5.3 Codex Spark, Grok 4.5)

    Per the submitter's disclosure, the proof and submission preparation used Claude Opus 5, with the other models on bounded mechanical subtasks. A second, independent Lean proof of the same conjecture (ChatGPT 5.6 Sol and Codex) was submitted days earlier.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from Lean ·

      scope Lean formalization of the result

      Kernel-checked Lean 4 proof; the axiom check includes native_decide (Lean.ofReduceBool / trustCompiler) for the exhaustive finite-graph certificates, which the submitter flags as the main trust assumption. Acceptance into the formal-conjectures repository is still pending, hence candidate status.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.