ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

Zero Forcing on 2-connected Outerplanar Graphs

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

zero-forcing-on-2-connected-outerplanar-graphsProbabilitymath.COmath.PRposed by Nolan Ison, Mark Kempton, Franklin Kenterrecorded: open · 1 machine check, unexamined

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

Consider maximal planar graphs, 3-connected planar graphs or planar 3-trees. For all such graphs G, is there a constant α<1\alpha<1 and a constant k such that Z(G)αn+kZ(G)\leq \alpha n+k ?

Context

Candidate 1 of the open problems stated in "Zero Forcing on 2-connected Outerplanar Graphs", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: Reconstructed statement: for finite simple undirected graphs, with n=V(G)n=|V(G)| and Z(G)Z(G) the standard zero forcing number, ask whether there are absolute constants α<1\alpha<1 and kk such that

    Z(G)αn+kZ(G)\le \alpha n+k

    for every GG in each of the following planar families: maximal planar graphs, 3-connected planar graphs, and planar 3-trees. I interpret the question as asking for one uniform linear bound away from nn; the proof below gives one for all planar graphs of minimum degree at least 33, hence for all three listed families up to harmless small degeneracies.

    Result: Yes. Let

    c=172(3536)35>0,α=1c<1.c=\frac1{72}\left(\frac{35}{36}\right)^{35}>0,\qquad \alpha=1-c<1.

    Then every finite simple planar graph GG with δ(G)3\delta(G)\ge 3 satisfies

    Z(G)(1c)n.Z(G)\le (1-c)n.

    Thus the listed graph classes satisfy the desired bound; taking k=1k=1 covers any nonstandard degenerate convention such as K1K_1.

    Proof. Call a vertex high if degv36\deg v\ge 36, and let HH be the set of high vertices. By Euler’s planar edge bound,

    36HvHdegv2E(G)<6n,36|H|\le \sum_{v\in H}\deg v\le 2|E(G)|<6n,

    so H<n/6|H|<n/6.

    Let BB be the set of vertices whose every neighbor is high. Put X=BHX=B\setminus H. Every xXx\in X has degree at least 33, all its neighbors lie in HH, and the bipartite subgraph between XX and HH is planar. Hence

    3Xe(X,H)2(X+H),3|X|\le e(X,H)\le 2(|X|+|H|),

    so X2H|X|\le 2|H|. Therefore

    BH+X3H<n/2.|B|\le |H|+|X|\le 3|H|<n/2.

    Thus at least n/2n/2 vertices have a neighbor of degree at most 3535. For each such vertex vv, choose one such neighbor (v)\ell(v).

    Now choose a random set RV(G)R\subseteq V(G), including each vertex independently with probability p=1/36p=1/36. Let WW be the set of vertices vBv\notin B such that

    vR,(v)R,(N((v)){v})R=.v\in R,\qquad \ell(v)\notin R,\qquad (N(\ell(v))\setminus\{v\})\cap R=\varnothing .

    For each vBv\notin B,

    Pr(vW)=p(1p)deg(v)136(3536)35.\Pr(v\in W)=p(1-p)^{\deg \ell(v)} \ge \frac1{36}\left(\frac{35}{36}\right)^{35}.

    By linearity of expectation, some choice of RR gives

    Wn2136(3536)35=cn.|W|\ge \frac n2\cdot \frac1{36}\left(\frac{35}{36}\right)^{35}=cn.

    For every wWw\in W, the vertex (w)W\ell(w)\notin W and has exactly one neighbor in WW, namely ww. Therefore V(G)WV(G)\setminus W is a zero forcing set: list the vertices of WW arbitrarily, and each ww is forced by (w)\ell(w) when its turn comes. Hence

    Z(G)nW(1c)n.Z(G)\le n-|W|\le (1-c)n.

    Since every 3-connected planar graph has minimum degree at least 33, every maximal planar graph with n4n\ge4 has minimum degree at least 33, and every planar 3-tree has minimum degree at least 33, the desired bound follows for all three families. Audit: the proof uses only finite simple planarity and δ(G)3\delta(G)\ge3; these hypotheses hold for the intended nondegenerate graph classes, and k=1k=1 absorbs any exceptional small convention.

    Citation: No prior resolution is used here. The proof is self-contained apart from the standard Euler planar and bipartite-planar edge bounds.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE2

      PASS

      The proof is rigorous and proves a stronger statement: every finite simple planar graph with minimum degree at least 3 has Z(G)(1c)nZ(G)\le (1-c)n for an explicit c>0c>0. The high-degree counting, bipartite planar bound, random construction of WW, and the zero-forcing argument for V(G)WV(G)\setminus W are all valid. The listed graph classes satisfy the needed minimum-degree condition except for small degenerate cases, which are covered by kk. No fatal gap or mismatch with the target conjecture is present.

      Novelty assessment

      TYPE2

      Classification rationale: Genuinely new as far as I could determine, and stronger than the asked statement: it proves a uniform Z(G)(1c)nZ(G)\le (1-c)n for all planar graphs with δ(G)3\delta(G)\ge 3. The proof is short and elementary, so this is not a top-journal result, but resolving a published open question for all three requested planar families likely supports at least a short standalone note in a specialized combinatorics/zero-forcing venue.

      Literature check: I searched for the exact question and variants involving “zero forcing” with “maximal planar,” “3-connected planar,” “planar 3-trees,” “minimum degree 3 planar,” “planar graphs,” as well as related terms such as induced matchings, Grundy domination, and total forcing. I found the 2023 Ison–Kempton–Kenter paper posing the question, and existing work on outerplanar or bounded-degree/cubic settings, but no paper or note giving this planar minimum-degree-3 bound or an implication that resolves the question.

      Citation: Nolan Ison, Mark Kempton, Franklin Kenter, “Zero Forcing on 2-connected Outerplanar Graphs,” arXiv:2308.11517, Question 1. No prior resolution found.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.