ProbXiv
sign in
Problem archiveProblem record

Statement

For a single-source unsplittable flow, find the optimal universal additive constant CC s.t. every feasible fractional flow xx with arc costs cc should admit an unsplittable routing yy with c⊤y≤c⊤xc^\top y \le c^\top x and ya≤xa+C⋅Dy_a \le x_a + C \cdot D on every arc. We provide several new results on CC:

(1) record lower bound for planar instances (against known ceiling 2): C≥5867676598725950000000000000=1.17353531974518;C \ge \frac{58676765987259}{50000000000000} = 1.17353531974518;

(2) local envelope ladder (proved): E(2)=1E(2) = 1, E(3)=9/8E(3) = 9/8, E(4)=(299−41⋅41)/32=1.13974707…E(4) = (299 - 41\cdot\sqrt{41})/32 = 1.13974707\ldots, attained by the counterexamples from our previous work; record constants of our previous work are now exact local envelopes of the general theory;

(3) global results: every exact-two-path instance with rows touching at most three terminals satisfies C≤2C \le 2 (first unconditional constant for an unbounded class); interaction arity m gives ⌈⌊3m/2⌋/2⌉⋅D\lceil\lfloor 3m/2\rfloor /2\rceil \cdot D;

(4) classes closed exactly: out-trees 0; two-layer hubs 1; outerplanar two-exit interval spines 1 (sharp); series-parallel ≤1\le 1;

(5) band merger constant K∗≥2.5652…K^* \ge 2.5652\ldots (twice the general lower bound 1.2826…1.2826\ldots).

Record

Comments

No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →

  1. proof attempt · #1

    GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 5

    No person is named on this work: the record names only the tool it came from, and no ProbXiv account is credited for it.

    AI involvement
    ai co developed
    — a person and a model developed the result together.

    Like the previous parts (https://vibemathed.com/problem/1-28249-lower-bound-and-partial-upper-bounds-for-cost-preserving-single-source-u), this work was written in close collaboration with GPT 5.6 Sol, Claude Fable 5, and Claude Opus 5, which contributed proofs, failed routes, adversarial reviews, code for the verification campaign, and more. This time, I cannot claim that it was a single tour de force by the models like the original counterexample by Rybin; it was a long journey with a lot of human involvement, but the key ideas were provided by the LLMs. I have personally verified and edited this work in its entirety, and all errors are mine.

  2. Recorded elsewhere on #1 · not checked here

    recorded: correctVibeMathed site check

    scope Reproduction by the VibeMathed site

    Reproduced by this site on 13 August 2026 from a clean clone, in two parts. First the repository's own suite: all fourteen verifiers in verify/run_all.sh pass, exit 0. Those cover Parts I and II only, so the headline planar record was rebuilt here independently. Reading only the raw arc list, a depth-first search rediscovers exactly two source-to-terminal paths for each of the six terminals; the fractional arc loads recompute exactly on all 21 arcs; all 64 routing overloads recompute exactly in rational arithmetic; the cost rule fits all 64 of the certificate's own cost deltas; 42 routings come out cost-preserving as claimed; and the minimum overload over those 42 is 58676765987259/5000000000000058676765987259/50000000000000, exactly the record. Planarity was checked independently too, by Euler (V=16V=16, E=21E=21, F=7F=7) and by networkx. The envelope constant was derived symbolically from the stated quartic rather than read off: t∗=(7−41)/4t^*=(7-\sqrt{41})/4 is the unique critical point in (0,2−3)(0,2-\sqrt3), giving E(4)=(299−4141)/32E(4)=(299-41\sqrt{41})/32. The 2,015-cell closure ledger is internally complete: five forms of 403, family counts summing to 2,015, every cell on one of nine solver-free lemmas. Not checked: the mixture characterization, the network-matrix total-unimodularity theorem and the tree-path four-colouring theorem, conventional proofs in an unreviewed preprint with no independent expert review. The tier records this site's reproduction of the certificates; the structural theory remains unreviewed.

    Repeated from the source; nothing was checked here.

Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.

Sign in

Solve with an agent

Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.

This opens a third-party site. Nothing is posted back to ProbXiv and nothing you write there is recorded here — what a model gives you is an attempt, which a person still has to check.