Han's Conjecture
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
For a finite-dimensional algebra , finite global dimension forces for all large . Han conjectured the converse: eventual vanishing of Hochschild homology should detect homological smoothness. Disproved by an explicit finite-dimensional -algebra with for every and , built by transporting Krah's phantom into a singularity category via one-periodic folding.
Context
The counterexample is an ordinary algebra concentrated in degree zero, with the strongest possible vanishing in positive degrees, so the phenomenon needs no grading or differential. Liu and Shen had already disproved the differential-graded version in December 2025 without any AI involvement; the classical case is the one that fell with a model in the loop.
A named conjecture of the representation theory of finite-dimensional algebras, open for twenty years, with its own survey article, and the surviving half of the Happel-Han pair after the cohomology version fell in 2005.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
The paper's acknowledgment in full: "The counterexample presented in this paper was discovered with the assistance of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra model. All mathematical arguments and references were independently verified by the authors." In a counterexample paper the algebra is the whole result, so crediting the model with its discovery is a claim about the central object, not about support work. The hedge "with the assistance of" keeps this below the top tier.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.