ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

A MINIMUM PROBLEM FOR FINITE SETS OF REAL NUMBERS WITH NON-NEGATIVE SUM

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

a-minimum-problem-for-finite-sets-of-real-numbers-with-non-negative-sumCombinatoricsmath.COposed by G. Chiaselotti, G. Marino, C. Nardirecorded: open · 1 machine check, unexamined

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

(P2) If q is an integer such that γ(n, r) ≤ q ≤ η(n, r), can we find n real numbers a1, …, an, such that r of them are non-negative and the remaining n − r are negative with ∑_{i=1}^n a_i ≥ 0, such that the number of the non-negative sums formed from these numbers is exactly q?

Context

Candidate 1 of the open problems stated in "A MINIMUM PROBLEM FOR FINITE SETS OF REAL NUMBERS WITH NON-NEGATIVE SUM", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: Reconstructed statement: for n1n\ge1 and 1rn1\le r\le n, let N(a)N(a) be the number of nonempty subsets S[n]S\subseteq[n] such that iSai0\sum_{i\in S}a_i\ge0, where exactly rr of the aia_i’s are nonnegative and the remaining nrn-r are negative, with iai0\sum_i a_i\ge0. Let γ(n,r)\gamma(n,r) and η(n,r)\eta(n,r) be the minimum and maximum possible values of N(a)N(a). The conjecture asks whether every integer q[γ(n,r),η(n,r)]q\in[\gamma(n,r),\eta(n,r)] is attained.

    The intended count is of nonempty subset sums; otherwise the stated maximum 2n12^n-1 in the source would be impossible. Also, for r=nr=n, the definition gives γ(n,n)=η(n,n)=2n1\gamma(n,n)=\eta(n,n)=2^n-1, so that case is trivial.

    Result: The conjecture is true.

    For r=nr=n, choose all ai>0a_i>0; every nonempty subset sum is nonnegative, so the only value is 2n12^n-1.

    Assume 1r<n1\le r<n, and put m=nrm=n-r. It is known, and also follows directly, that

    γ(n,r)=2n1,η(n,r)=2n2m.\gamma(n,r)=2^{n-1},\qquad \eta(n,r)=2^n-2^m .

    Choose positive numbers

    p1,,pr, b1,,bmp_1,\dots,p_r,\ b_1,\dots,b_m

    with ipi=jbj\sum_i p_i=\sum_j b_j, and such that the signed vector

    a0=(p1,,pr,b1,,bm)a^0=(p_1,\dots,p_r,-b_1,\dots,-b_m)

    has no zero subset sum except the empty set and the full set. Such a choice exists: take p1,,pr,b1,,bm1p_1,\dots,p_r,b_1,\dots,b_{m-1} positive and Q\mathbb Q-linearly independent with pi>j<mbj\sum p_i>\sum_{j<m}b_j, then set bm=pij<mbjb_m=\sum p_i-\sum_{j<m}b_j.

    For this initial vector, the total sum is 00. Every proper nonempty subset SS pairs with its complement ScS^c, and their sums are nonzero opposites. Hence exactly one of each complementary pair is nonnegative, while the full set is also nonnegative. Therefore

    N(a0)=2n22+1=2n1.N(a^0)=\frac{2^n-2}{2}+1=2^{n-1}.

    Now increase only the positive coordinates:

    ai(t)=pi+tci(1ir),ar+j(t)=bj(1jm),a_i(t)=p_i+t c_i\quad(1\le i\le r),\qquad a_{r+j}(t)=-b_j\quad(1\le j\le m),

    where ci>0c_i>0 are chosen generically. For each subset SS containing at least one positive coordinate, its sum is affine increasing in tt. Purely negative subsets remain negative forever.

    For each initially negative mixed subset SS, there is a unique crossing time

    τS=iSai0iS[r]ci>0.\tau_S=\frac{-\sum_{i\in S}a_i^0}{\sum_{i\in S\cap[r]}c_i}>0.

    Because there are only finitely many such subsets, the cic_i’s may be chosen outside finitely many hyperplanes so that all τS\tau_S are distinct. Then as tt increases, the count N(a(t))N(a(t)) starts at 2n12^{n-1} and rises by exactly 11 at each crossing.

    For sufficiently large tt, every subset containing at least one positive coordinate has nonnegative sum, and every nonempty purely negative subset remains negative. Thus

    N(a(t))=(2r1)2m=2n2m=η(n,r).N(a(t))=(2^r-1)2^m=2^n-2^m=\eta(n,r).

    Since the count increases one at a time from γ(n,r)\gamma(n,r) to η(n,r)\eta(n,r), every integer qq in that interval is attained.

    Audit: the construction keeps exactly rr positive entries and mm negative entries, keeps the total sum nonnegative for all t0t\ge0, counts nonempty indexed subset sums, handles r=nr=n separately, and realizes exactly the required qq.

    Citation: Problem source: G. Chiaselotti, G. Marino, C. Nardi, “A minimum problem for finite sets of real numbers with non-negative sum,” arXiv:1102.4761. The proof above gives a complete resolution of P2.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1

      PASS

      The proof attacks the correct P2 statement and is mathematically sound. The zero-total generic initial vector gives exactly 2n1=γ(n,r)2^{n-1}=\gamma(n,r) nonempty nonnegative subset sums for r<nr<n by complement pairing. Increasing only the positive coordinates preserves the required signs and nonnegative total, makes every mixed subset sum monotone increasing, and—after a generic choice of slopes—causes initially negative mixed subsets to cross zero one at a time. Thus the count realizes every integer up to the final value 2n2nr=η(n,r)2^n-2^{n-r}=\eta(n,r). The r=nr=n case is handled separately.

      The genericity and no-extra-zero conditions are justified by the stated Q\mathbb Q-linear independence construction. I found no existing exact resolution of P2 beyond the cited paper’s partial/generalized weighted-Boolean-map result, so this is not merely known.

      Novelty assessment

      TYPE1

      Classification rationale: The result appears genuinely new, but it is a very short and elementary interpolation argument once the endpoint values γ(n,r)\gamma(n,r) and η(n,r)\eta(n,r) are known. It resolves a narrow question from a relatively obscure paper, but the proof is routine enough that it is unlikely to support a standalone standard combinatorics-journal paper without further extensions.

      Literature check: I found the original arXiv paper and its published version. Both state P2 and give only the weighted-Boolean-map analogue/partial result, not the real-number realization proved here. Searches of arXiv for exact and related phrases (“weighted boolean maps,” “non-negative partial sums,” title phrases) found only the original paper in this topic. DOAJ searches for the title, “nonnegative partial sums,” “positive boolean values,” and related phrases likewise found only the original published paper. I did not find any later paper, note, or open-access source containing this exact interval-realization result or a stronger theorem.

      Citation: G. Chiaselotti, G. Marino, C. Nardi, “A Minimum Problem for Finite Sets of Real Numbers with Nonnegative Sum,” Journal of Applied Mathematics 2012, Article ID 847958, DOI: 10.1155/2012/847958; arXiv:1102.4761.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.