ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

AUTOMATED CONJECTURING VII: THE GRAPH BRAIN PROJECT & BIG MATHEMATICS

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

automated-conjecturing-vii-the-graph-brain-project-big-mathematics-7Information Theorymath.COmath.ITposed by N. Bushaw, C. E. Larson, N. Van Cleemput, R. Barden, C. Callison, A. Fernandez, B. Harris, I. Holden, D. Muncy, C. O'Shea, J. Shive, J. Raines, P. Rana, B. Ward, N. Wilcox-Cookrecorded: open · 1 machine check, unexamined

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

independence_number(x)>= ceil(lovasz_theta(x))-girth(x)

Context

Candidate 7 of the open problems stated in "AUTOMATED CONJECTURING VII: THE GRAPH BRAIN PROJECT & BIG MATHEMATICS", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: Reconstructed statement: for every finite simple graph GG,

    α(G)ϑ(G)g(G),\alpha(G)\ge \lceil \vartheta(G)\rceil-g(G),

    where α\alpha is independence number, ϑ\vartheta is the usual Lovász theta number satisfying α(G)ϑ(G)\alpha(G)\le \vartheta(G), and g(G)g(G) is girth. The conjecture text lists exactly these graph invariants. The counterexample below is connected and has a triangle, so it is unaffected by common connectedness or girth-convention ambiguities.

    Result: The statement is false.

    Let HH be the disjoint union of 1313 copies of C5C_5, and let

    G=K1HG=K_1\vee H

    be the join of HH with one new universal vertex.

    Standard theta facts: ϑ(C5)=5\vartheta(C_5)=\sqrt5, ϑ\vartheta is additive on disjoint unions, and

    ϑ(AB)=max{ϑ(A),ϑ(B)}.\vartheta(A\vee B)=\max\{\vartheta(A),\vartheta(B)\}.

    Hence

    ϑ(G)=ϑ(H)=135.\vartheta(G)=\vartheta(H)=13\sqrt5.

    Since 292<1325<30229^2<13^2\cdot 5<30^2, we have

    ϑ(G)=135=30.\lceil \vartheta(G)\rceil=\lceil 13\sqrt5\rceil=30.

    Also, each C5C_5 has independence number 22, so

    α(H)=26.\alpha(H)=26.

    The universal vertex cannot be used together with any vertex of HH, hence

    α(G)=26.\alpha(G)=26.

    Finally, GG contains a triangle: the universal vertex together with any edge of a C5C_5. Thus

    g(G)=3.g(G)=3.

    Therefore the conjectured inequality gives

    26=α(G)ϑ(G)g(G)=303=27,26=\alpha(G)\ge \lceil\vartheta(G)\rceil-g(G)=30-3=27,

    which is false. So this connected 6666-vertex graph is a counterexample.

    Citation: The theta facts used above are classical; see L. Lovász, “On the Shannon capacity of a graph,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 25 (1979), 1–7.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification KNOWN

      PASS

      The counterexample attacks the correct conjecture. For G=K1(13C5)G=K_1\vee(13C_5), the standard theta identities give ϑ(G)=135\vartheta(G)=13\sqrt5, so ϑ(G)=30\lceil\vartheta(G)\rceil=30. Also α(G)=26\alpha(G)=26 and g(G)=3g(G)=3, hence the conjectured bound would require 262726\ge 27, false. The graph is connected, and the cited theta facts are standard.

      Novelty assessment

      KNOWN

      Classification rationale: The accepted solution gives a counterexample, but the exact conjecture was already publicly resolved negatively. Thus the resolution is not new, even if the 66-vertex construction is a different certificate.

      Literature check: Searching the exact Graph Brain syntax and variants led to the project’s earlier issue #191, “Open Conjecture: alpha >= ceil(lovasz_theta) - girth.” In a comment dated Oct. 28, 2017, user a234 states: “The Paley graph of order 101 is a counterexample.” The issue is now closed.

      Citation: math1um/objects-invariants-properties, Issue #191, “Open Conjecture: alpha >= ceil(lovasz_theta) - girth,” comment by a234, Oct. 28, 2017. https://github.com/math1um/objects-invariants-properties/issues/191#issuecomment-340132963

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.