Brill-Noether Existence on Graphs via R-Divisors, Polytopes and Lattices
Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.
Statement
(Brill-Noether Existence for ℝ-Divisors on Graphs) Let ρ(g,r,d)=g-(r+1)(g-d+r). Fix two real numbers r ≥0, 2 g-2 ≥d. If ρ(g,r,d)≥0 then there exists an ℝ-divisor of degree at most d and rank equal to r on G.
Context
Candidate 2 of the open problems stated in "Brill-Noether Existence on Graphs via R-Divisors, Polytopes and Lattices", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
NEW
Problem: Reconstructed conjecture: for every connected loop-free multigraph of genus , and nonnegative real with , if
then has an -divisor of degree at most and rank exactly . The source paper’s full statement includes ; the counterexample below satisfies this, so the ambiguity is immaterial.
Result: The conjecture is false.
Let have vertices , two parallel edges between , and two parallel edges between . Then is connected and loop-free, with , hence genus
Take
Then , and
We show no -divisor of degree has rank .
For this graph the Laplacian lattice is
The acyclic-orientation representatives are
all congruent modulo . Thus
Using the standard degree-plus rank formula for -divisors,
Let with . Put
Then . Write , where , , and set . Choose nonnegative integers summing to , killing the largest fractional parts if , and all fractional parts if . Let , so , and define . Then , and
If , this is at most .
If , it is at most .
If , it is at most .
If , it is .Therefore for every of degree ,
So satisfies the hypotheses but has no -divisor of degree at most and rank . This refutes the conjecture.
Citation: Definitions and the rank formula are from Manjunath, “Brill-Noether Existence on Graphs via -Divisors, Polytopes and Lattices,” Selecta Math. 28 (2022), arXiv:1911.11514.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 1 machine checkNo person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.
Machine check · not human verification
machine: correctscope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE2
PASS
The proposed counterexample attacks the stated real-parameter conjecture. The graph is an allowed connected loop-free multigraph of genus , and satisfy and . The computation of the Laplacian lattice and the relevant non-special divisor coset is correct, and the rank formula
is applied correctly. The fractional-part argument constructs, for every divisor of degree , a with , hence . Thus no such divisor has rank , refuting the conjecture.
Novelty assessment
TYPE2
Classification rationale: The counterexample appears genuinely new and refutes an explicit conjecture from a recent Selecta Mathematica paper. The construction is very small and the proof is elementary once the real-divisor rank formula is used, so this is not top-journal level. Still, disproving a published Brill–Noether-type conjecture should be publishable as a short standalone note or corrigendum-style paper, especially if accompanied by some explanation of the true obstruction.
Literature check: I found no prior occurrence of this counterexample or any stronger published disproof. Searches for the exact title, “covering radius conjecture,” “Brill-Noether existence for R-divisors,” “-divisors” with Brill–Noether, “rank ,” “,” and “” did not reveal a known counterexample. OpenAlex/Crossref list only one substantive citing paper, Christ–Ma on graph refinements, and it does not refute Manjunath’s -divisor conjecture; it concerns Baker’s integer-divisor conjecture on refinements.
Citation: Madhusudan Manjunath, “Brill–Noether existence on graphs via -divisors, polytopes and lattices,” Selecta Math. (N.S.) 28, Article 35 (2022), arXiv:1911.11514.
No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.