Large Hypercube Intervals in Bruhat Order
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
How large can a Bruhat interval in that is a poset hypercube be? Using a permutation pattern suggested by AlphaEvolve, the authors exhibit hypercube intervals of dimension for a power of 2, matching the largest possible dimension up to a constant - in the problem circle around the combinatorial invariance conjecture for Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials.
Context
Asymptotically optimal for powers of 2; the exact extremal answer for general n stays open.
A question in the active problem circle around combinatorial invariance of Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials, pursued by leading figures of the field.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
AlphaEvolve, searching evolutionarily rather than exhaustively, "produced a pattern which performed well for the n tested, and which we show works well for general n" - the agent found the construction, the humans proved it works in general.
Asymptotically optimal for powers of 2; the exact extremal answer for general n stays open.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.