Cover-Preserving Order Embeddings into Boolean Lattices
Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.
Statement
Which posets Q allow for a map φ as above?
Context
Candidate 5 of the open problems stated in "Cover-Preserving Order Embeddings into Boolean Lattices", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
NEW
Problem: Reconstructed statement: for a finite poset , characterize when there is an isometric order embedding
such that
for all , where is the undirected cover graph. The section title “Isometric Order Embeddings of Posets into ” and the phrase “map as above” support including both order-embedding and distance-preserving conditions. Assume is connected; otherwise ordinary graph distance is not finite between components.
Result: Such posets are exactly those whose cover graph is a partial cube and whose cover orientation is coherent on every Djoković–Winkler class.
Precisely, for an edge of , let
Then admits such a iff:
- is a partial cube;
- whenever and are cover edges in the same Djoković–Winkler -class, one has
Equivalently, all upward cover edges in a fixed -class cross the corresponding partial-cube cut in the same direction.
Proof. If exists, then is isometrically embedded in a hypercube, hence is a partial cube. A cover edge maps to two subsets differing in one coordinate, and because is order-preserving, that coordinate is added, not removed. Edges in the same -class are precisely edges changing the same hypercube coordinate, so all upward edges in that class cross the same coordinate cut in the same direction. Thus condition 2 holds.
Conversely, assume 1 and 2. Let . For each -class , choose an upward edge , and define
By coherence this choice orients the cut consistently. Define
The standard partial-cube embedding theorem says this map is an isometric embedding of into . For a cover edge in class , coherence gives
Hence along every saturated chain the image only increases, so .
Conversely, if , take a shortest path in from to . Its image is a shortest hypercube path from to . Since the endpoint subsets are nested, every step adds one coordinate and removes none. By coherence, each corresponding cover edge is traversed upward in . Thus the path is a saturated chain from to , so . Therefore is an isometric order embedding.
The least possible is .
Citation: Uses the classical partial-cube characterization of Djoković–Winkler: D. Ž. Djoković, “Distance-preserving subgraphs of hypercubes,” J. Combin. Theory B 14 (1973), 263–267. Source question: Marcel Wild, “Cover-preserving order embeddings into Boolean lattices,” Order 9 (1992), 209–232.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 1 machine checkNo person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.
Machine check · not human verification
machine: correctscope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification KNOWN
PASS
The solution correctly resolves the isometric order-embedding interpretation of Question 5. The necessity follows from standard partial-cube theory, and the Θ-class coherence condition exactly captures that every cover edge is oriented as coordinate addition. Conversely, the Θ-class semicube embedding is isometric, and coherence proves both order preservation and order reflection. No fatal gap is apparent; the result is essentially a direct corollary of classical partial-cube theory.
Novelty assessment
KNOWN
Classification rationale: The result is a direct specialization of known media/partial-cube representation theory. An orientation of a medium chooses one direction in each token/reverse-token pair, equivalently one coherent direction for each Θ-class of a partial cube. Ovchinnikov’s representation theorem for oriented media then gives exactly the Boolean-set embedding by positive contents.
Literature check: I checked the original Wild paper and citing literature, plus searches around “isometric order embedding Boolean lattice,” “partial cube poset,” “Θ-class orientation,” “well-graded family,” and media/learning-space terminology. The closest and decisive source is Ovchinnikov’s media theory paper: Theorem 5.1 and Corollary 5.1 represent any oriented medium by a well-graded family of sets, while Theorem 6.1 identifies graphs of media with partial cubes. This is stronger than the submitted poset formulation.
Citation: S. Ovchinnikov, “Media theory: representations and examples,” arXiv:math/0512282, 2005, especially Theorems 5.1 and 6.1. See also D. Ž. Djoković, “Distance-preserving subgraphs of hypercubes,” J. Combin. Theory B 14 (1973), 263–267; M. Wild, “Cover-preserving order embeddings into Boolean lattices,” Order 9 (1992), 209–232.
No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.