ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

Cover-Preserving Order Embeddings into Boolean Lattices

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

cover-preserving-order-embeddings-into-boolean-lattices-5Representation Theorymath.COmath.RTposed by Marcel Wildrecorded: open · 1 machine check, unexamined

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

Which posets Q allow for a map φ as above?

Context

Candidate 5 of the open problems stated in "Cover-Preserving Order Embeddings into Boolean Lattices", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: Reconstructed statement: for a finite poset QQ, characterize when there is an isometric order embedding

    φ:Q2[n]\varphi:Q\to 2^{[n]}

    such that

    xQy    φ(x)φ(y),dΓ(Q)(x,y)=φ(x)φ(y)x\le_Q y \iff \varphi(x)\subseteq \varphi(y), \qquad d_{\Gamma(Q)}(x,y)=|\varphi(x)\triangle\varphi(y)|

    for all x,yQx,y\in Q, where Γ(Q)\Gamma(Q) is the undirected cover graph. The section title “Isometric Order Embeddings of Posets into 2n2^n” and the phrase “map φ\varphi as above” support including both order-embedding and distance-preserving conditions. Assume Γ(Q)\Gamma(Q) is connected; otherwise ordinary graph distance is not finite between components.

    Result: Such posets are exactly those whose cover graph is a partial cube and whose cover orientation is coherent on every Djoković–Winkler class.

    Precisely, for an edge abab of Γ(Q)\Gamma(Q), let

    Wab:={z:d(z,a)<d(z,b)}.W_{ab}:=\{z:d(z,a)<d(z,b)\}.

    Then QQ admits such a φ\varphi iff:

    1. Γ(Q)\Gamma(Q) is a partial cube;
    2. whenever aba\prec b and cdc\prec d are cover edges in the same Djoković–Winkler Θ\Theta-class, one has
    cWab,dWba.c\in W_{ab},\qquad d\in W_{ba}.

    Equivalently, all upward cover edges in a fixed Θ\Theta-class cross the corresponding partial-cube cut in the same direction.

    Proof. If φ\varphi exists, then Γ(Q)\Gamma(Q) is isometrically embedded in a hypercube, hence is a partial cube. A cover edge aba\prec b maps to two subsets differing in one coordinate, and because φ\varphi is order-preserving, that coordinate is added, not removed. Edges in the same Θ\Theta-class are precisely edges changing the same hypercube coordinate, so all upward edges in that class cross the same coordinate cut in the same direction. Thus condition 2 holds.

    Conversely, assume 1 and 2. Let C=E(Γ(Q))/Θ\mathcal C=E(\Gamma(Q))/\Theta. For each Θ\Theta-class CC, choose an upward edge aCbCCa_C\prec b_C\in C, and define

    HC:=WaCbC,HC+:=WbCaC.H_C^-:=W_{a_Cb_C},\qquad H_C^+:=W_{b_Ca_C}.

    By coherence this choice orients the cut consistently. Define

    φ(x):={CC:xHC+}.\varphi(x):=\{C\in\mathcal C:x\in H_C^+\}.

    The standard partial-cube embedding theorem says this map is an isometric embedding of Γ(Q)\Gamma(Q) into 2C2^{\mathcal C}. For a cover edge xyx\prec y in class CC, coherence gives

    φ(y)=φ(x){C}.\varphi(y)=\varphi(x)\cup\{C\}.

    Hence along every saturated chain the image only increases, so xQyφ(x)φ(y)x\le_Q y\Rightarrow \varphi(x)\subseteq\varphi(y).

    Conversely, if φ(x)φ(y)\varphi(x)\subseteq\varphi(y), take a shortest path in Γ(Q)\Gamma(Q) from xx to yy. Its image is a shortest hypercube path from φ(x)\varphi(x) to φ(y)\varphi(y). Since the endpoint subsets are nested, every step adds one coordinate and removes none. By coherence, each corresponding cover edge is traversed upward in QQ. Thus the path is a saturated chain from xx to yy, so xQyx\le_Q y. Therefore φ\varphi is an isometric order embedding.

    The least possible nn is E(Γ(Q))/Θ|E(\Gamma(Q))/\Theta|.

    Citation: Uses the classical partial-cube characterization of Djoković–Winkler: D. Ž. Djoković, “Distance-preserving subgraphs of hypercubes,” J. Combin. Theory B 14 (1973), 263–267. Source question: Marcel Wild, “Cover-preserving order embeddings into Boolean lattices,” Order 9 (1992), 209–232.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification KNOWN

      PASS

      The solution correctly resolves the isometric order-embedding interpretation of Question 5. The necessity follows from standard partial-cube theory, and the Θ-class coherence condition exactly captures that every cover edge is oriented as coordinate addition. Conversely, the Θ-class semicube embedding is isometric, and coherence proves both order preservation and order reflection. No fatal gap is apparent; the result is essentially a direct corollary of classical partial-cube theory.

      Novelty assessment

      KNOWN

      Classification rationale: The result is a direct specialization of known media/partial-cube representation theory. An orientation of a medium chooses one direction in each token/reverse-token pair, equivalently one coherent direction for each Θ-class of a partial cube. Ovchinnikov’s representation theorem for oriented media then gives exactly the Boolean-set embedding by positive contents.

      Literature check: I checked the original Wild paper and citing literature, plus searches around “isometric order embedding Boolean lattice,” “partial cube poset,” “Θ-class orientation,” “well-graded family,” and media/learning-space terminology. The closest and decisive source is Ovchinnikov’s media theory paper: Theorem 5.1 and Corollary 5.1 represent any oriented medium by a well-graded family of sets, while Theorem 6.1 identifies graphs of media with partial cubes. This is stronger than the submitted poset formulation.

      Citation: S. Ovchinnikov, “Media theory: representations and examples,” arXiv:math/0512282, 2005, especially Theorems 5.1 and 6.1. See also D. Ž. Djoković, “Distance-preserving subgraphs of hypercubes,” J. Combin. Theory B 14 (1973), 263–267; M. Wild, “Cover-preserving order embeddings into Boolean lattices,” Order 9 (1992), 209–232.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.