The Leading Constant for Large-Order Davenport-Schinzel Sequences
Statement
Wellman and Pettie noted that the true leading constant for large-order Davenport-Schinzel sequences was known only to lie in an interval. The paper improves the Roselle-Stanton lower bound to match the pigeonhole upper bound in the leading term, resolving the constant to exactly 1/2.
Record
- Source
- Added
Comments
No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →
proof attempt · #1
Jesse Geneson, using Claude 4.6, GPT 5.2That credit came with the record as it was imported. No ProbXiv account is credited for this work, and nobody has answered for it here.
"Claude 4.6 and GPT 5.2 were used for proof development, exposition, and revision." No individual step is attributed, so the lower tier applies per the methodology.
Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.
Sign inSolve with an agent
Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.