Conjectures of Hopkins, Sagan-Wilson and Defant et al. on Lattices, Parking Functions and the Plactic Monoid
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
A collection of open problems from the algebraic and enumerative combinatorics literature, resolved in one paper: a conjecture of Defant, Jiang, Marczinzik, Segovia, Speyer, Thomas and Williams on the echelonmotion operator on modular lattices, which also yields a new algebraic bijective proof of Dilworth's theorem; conjectures of Hopkins on parking function statistics studied by Stanley and Yin; and two conjectures of Sagan and Wilson on centralizers in the plactic monoid.
Context
A bundle of recent specialist conjectures from separate corners of algebraic combinatorics, each comparable to a documented named question with a small audience.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
The claim is unusually flat: all of these proofs were obtained autonomously by ChatGPT 5.4 Pro. The author's role was selecting the problems and writing them up. Worth noting that the first conjecture settled is one the author himself co-posed, so this is a mathematician using a model to close his own open problem.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.