ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

Dyck Numbers, IV. Nested patterns in OEIS A036991

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

dyck-numbers-iv-nested-patterns-in-oeis-a036991Dynamical Systemsmath.COmath.DSposed by Gennady Ereminrecorded: open · 1 machine check, unexamined

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

Conjecture 16. The core pattern μn(n=8,10,12,...)\mu_{n}(n=8,10,12,...) is copied in the second and third subsegments of the pattern μn+2\mu_{n+2} .

Context

Candidate 1 of the open problems stated in "Dyck Numbers, IV. Nested patterns in OEIS A036991", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: Reconstructed statement. Let Mm=2m1M_m=2^m-1. A positive integer belongs to OEIS A036991 iff its binary expansion ww has nonnegative balance

    #1(u)#0(u)0\#1(u)-\#0(u)\ge 0

    for every suffix uu of ww. The mm-level consists of such integers of binary length mm.

    For even m6m\ge 6, define the core pattern

    μm={tLm:Mm1<tMm1+2m3},\mu_m=\{t\in \mathcal L_m: M_{m-1}<t\le M_{m-1}+2^{m-3}\},

    listed increasingly. For m10m\ge 10, split this core interval into four equal subsegments. Conjecture 16 says that, for every even n8n\ge 8, μn\mu_n is copied in the second and third subsegments of μn+2\mu_{n+2}.

    This reconstruction is supported by the paper’s definitions of levels, cores, subsegments, suffix “dynamics,” and by its offset formula (6).

    Result: The conjecture is true. More precisely, if μn+2,2\mu_{n+2,2} and μn+2,3\mu_{n+2,3} denote the second and third subsegments of μn+2\mu_{n+2}, then

    μn+2,2=μn+132n3,μn+2,3=μn+72n2.\mu_{n+2,2}=\mu_n+13\cdot 2^{n-3}, \qquad \mu_{n+2,3}=\mu_n+7\cdot 2^{n-2}.

    Proof. Write binary concatenation by juxtaposition and let h(w)=#1(w)#0(w)h(w)=\#1(w)-\#0(w). For even n6n\ge 6, every element of μn\mu_n has binary form

    100v,v=n3.100v,\qquad |v|=n-3.

    Such a word is valid iff every suffix of vv has nonnegative balance and h(v)3h(v)\ge 3: the only new suffix constraints are 0v0v and 00v00v, requiring h(v)1h(v)\ge1 and h(v)2h(v)\ge2; since v|v| is odd, this is h(v)3h(v)\ge3.

    Now consider μn+2\mu_{n+2}. Its core words have form 100s100s, s=n1|s|=n-1. Its second subsegment consists exactly of words

    10001v,10001v,

    and its third subsegment exactly of words

    10010v,10010v,

    with v=n3|v|=n-3.

    For 10001v10001v, the relevant tail is s=01vs=01v. Its suffixes are 01v,1v01v,1v, and suffixes of vv, and h(01v)=h(v)h(01v)=h(v). Hence 10001v10001v is in μn+2\mu_{n+2} iff 100v100v is in μn\mu_n.

    For 10010v10010v, the relevant tail is s=10vs=10v. Its suffixes include 10v,0v10v,0v, and suffixes of vv. Since membership in the core requires h(10v)=h(v)3h(10v)=h(v)\ge3, the extra suffix 0v0v has balance at least 22. Thus again 10010v10010v is in μn+2\mu_{n+2} iff 100v100v is in μn\mu_n.

    Finally,

    [10001v]2[100v]2=132n3,[10001v]_2-[100v]_2=13\cdot2^{n-3},

    and

    [10010v]2[100v]2=142n3=72n2.[10010v]_2-[100v]_2=14\cdot2^{n-3}=7\cdot2^{n-2}.

    The order is preserved, so the second and third subsegments are exact translated copies of μn\mu_n, as claimed.

    Citation: Conjecture and terminology: G. Eremin, “Dyck Numbers, IV. Nested patterns in OEIS A036991,” arXiv:2306.10318, Conjecture 16. The proof above is the resolution.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1

      PASS

      The proof addresses the stated core-copy conjecture and gives a complete argument: it correctly characterizes A036991 by suffix balance, identifies the relevant core words 100v100v, and proves that the second and third subsegments 10001v10001v and 10010v10010v are valid exactly when 100v100v is valid. The computed offsets show exact translated copies, preserving order. I found no prior resolution in the arXiv/OEIS context checked.

      Novelty assessment

      TYPE1

      Classification rationale: Assuming the accepted proof is correct, this is a genuinely new but very small observation: it is a direct binary-word/suffix-balance verification for a niche pattern conjecture from a recent preprint. The argument is short and routine once the definitions are unpacked, and the result would be appropriate as an OEIS comment, note to the author, or addendum—not a standalone combinatorics paper.

      Literature check: I found no prior resolution. Searches of arXiv for A036991/Dyck Numbers return only Eremin’s related preprints and no later proof of Conjecture 16. OEIS A036991 links the source paper but has no entry resolving the core-pattern conjecture. Web searches for exact phrases such as “Conjecture 16” “A036991”, “second and third subsegments” “A036991”, “core pattern” “A036991”, and the binary forms “10001”/“10010” with A036991 found only the original arXiv paper or mirrors (alphaXiv, ResearchGate, EmergentMind), not an independent proof.

      Citation: Gennady Eremin, “Dyck Numbers, IV. Nested patterns in OEIS A036991,” arXiv:2306.10318, Conjecture 16. Also OEIS A036991.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.