Erdős Problem #856
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
Let and be the maximum of over all containing no subsets with the same pairwise least common multiple. Estimate . The claimed answer: , where is a weighted generalization of the Tang-Zhang sunflower capacity.
Context
Identifies the exponent as a variational sunflower-capacity constant, sharpening the Tang-Zhang bounds; the value of that constant itself remains open, as does site acceptance
A numbered problem from the Erdos catalog: real and documented, with a specialist audience. Checked against erdosproblems.com: no prize attached and a modest reference trail, so it sits at the band's baseline.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
A weighted version of the Tang-Zhang sunflower-capacity argument giving the exact logarithmic exponent was developed with GPT-5.4 Pro, using a mass-transport idea from the forum's discussion of problem #1196.
Identifies the exponent as a variational sunflower-capacity constant, sharpening the Tang-Zhang bounds; the value of that constant itself remains open, as does site acceptance
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.