ProbXiv
sign in
unchecked

Erdős Problem #856

Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.

erdos-856Number theoryposed by Paul Erdős, 1970recorded: candidate

1 attempt · no person has looked

Statement

Let k3k\geq 3 and fk(N)f_k(N) be the maximum of nA1n\sum_{n\in A}\frac{1}{n} over all A{1,,N}A\subseteq\{1,\ldots,N\} containing no kk subsets with the same pairwise least common multiple. Estimate fk(N)f_k(N). The claimed answer: fk(N)=(logN)γk+o(1)f_k(N)=(\log N)^{\gamma_k+o(1)}, where γk\gamma_k is a weighted generalization of the Tang-Zhang sunflower capacity.

Context

Identifies the exponent as a variational sunflower-capacity constant, sharpening the Tang-Zhang bounds; the value of that constant itself remains open, as does site acceptance

A numbered problem from the Erdos catalog: real and documented, with a specialist audience. Checked against erdosproblems.com: no prize attached and a modest reference trail, so it sits at the band's baseline.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    proof attemptGPT-5.4 Pro with Przemysław Chojecki ·
    AI involvement
    ai co developed
    a person and a model developed the result together.
    models
    GPT-5.4 Pro
    people
    Przemysław Chojecki

    A weighted version of the Tang-Zhang sunflower-capacity argument giving the exact logarithmic exponent was developed with GPT-5.4 Pro, using a mass-transport idea from the forum's discussion of problem #1196.

    Identifies the exponent as a variational sunflower-capacity constant, sharpening the Tang-Zhang bounds; the value of that constant itself remains open, as does site acceptance

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 0 machine checks

    No person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.