Erdos-Graham Question on Averages of Unit Fractions
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
Erdos and Graham asked whether a positive-density subset of can avoid having any two distinct elements whose unit fractions average to a unit fraction. It can: there is a constant such that for all large some of size has that property, which also gives the best known lower bounds for related unit-fraction avoidance problems.
Context
A question from the Erdos-Graham problem collection on unit fractions, the kind of documented named problem that has a real if specialized following.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
The author gives a narrative rather than a blanket acknowledgement. Starting from a computation of Stijn Cambie, he asked ChatGPT to look for patterns in Cambie's extremal set that might suggest a generalization; it observed that in a pair with a given ratio the larger element is usually absent unless the smaller is absent for other reasons, and described a change of variables. Dropping the hedges in that observation gives the set the paper analyzes, which turns out to be essentially where Hooley's function takes its minimum value. The model was also used for reference search and proofreading.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.