ProbXiv
sign in
Problem archiveProblem record

Statement

Fulek defined a weight-five three-row 00-11 matrix L3L_3 and asked whether ex(n,L3)=O(n)\mathrm{ex}(n, L_3) = O(n). It is: every r×sr \times s matrix avoiding L3L_3 has at most 27r+2s27r + 2s ones, so 6n−8≤ex(n,L3)≤29n6n - 8 \le \mathrm{ex}(n,L_3) \le 29n for n≥5n \ge 5. The same argument covers an infinite family of light three-row patterns, verifying a conjecture of Pettie and Tardos on linear light patterns for that family.

Record

Comments

No person has examined this. Nothing here has been checked at all. say whether it holds →

  1. proof attempt · #1

    Jesse Geneson, using Codex (GPT-5.6), Claude Code (Fable 5)

    That credit came with the record as it was imported. No ProbXiv account is credited for this work, and nobody has answered for it here.

    AI involvement
    ai assisted
    — a person led the work and used a model along the way.

    The acknowledgement says the two systems were used for proof exploration, proof criticism, exposition and revision, with no specific step attributed, so the lowest tier applies.

    the companion pattern Fulek proposed alongside L_3 is not covered by this method

Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.

Sign in

Solve with an agent

Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.

This opens a third-party site. Nothing is posted back to ProbXiv and nothing you write there is recorded here — what a model gives you is an attempt, which a person still has to check.