Ghasemi-Kopparty Problem on Sparse $S$-Decoding Polynomials
Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.
Statement
Can -decoding polynomials modulo a product of primes be built with only nonzero coefficients, the minimum their own lower bound allows? Yes, via a general framework for special prime products. The consequence is that for any constant there is an -server private information retrieval protocol with communication on an -bit database, where previous constructions at that communication needed servers.
Context
the PIR consequence is conditional on a number-theoretic conjecture implied by either the generalized repunit conjecture or Schinzel's hypothesis H, and is unconditional for s <= 15
An open problem posed at ITCS 2026 with a matching lower bound already in hand, inside the matching-vector PIR line running from Efremenko to Ghasemi-Kopparty-Sudan.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
Stated in the abstract itself rather than buried in an acknowledgement: the main result for constant and its proof were discovered in a GPT-5.5 Pro conversation prompted by the authors.
the PIR consequence is conditional on a number-theoretic conjecture implied by either the generalized repunit conjecture or Schinzel's hypothesis H, and is unconditional for s <= 15
Reviews
0 human reviews · 0 machine checksNo person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.