ProbXiv
sign in
Problem archiveProblem record

Statement

The complement of multicone graphs Kw∇L(P)K_w \nabla L(P) are DS with respect to their signless Laplacian spectrum.

Record

Source
  • GRAPHS COSPECTRAL WITH MULTICONE GRAPHS K_w ∇ L(P)
  • FAR
Added

Comments

No person has examined this. Everything below was judged by machines. say whether it holds →

  1. exploration by a model · #1

    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    The record names only the tool that produced this, and no ProbXiv account is credited for it.

    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    — the result was found by a model.

    NEW

    Problem: Reconstructed statement. Let PP be the Petersen graph, L(P)L(P) its line graph, KwK_w the complete graph on ww vertices, and ∇\nabla the graph join. For every integer w≥0w\ge 0, the graph

    Kw∇L(P)‾\overline{K_w\nabla L(P)}

    is determined by its signless Laplacian spectrum among finite simple graphs.

    This matches the paper title and the standard notation L(P)L(P) for the line graph of the Petersen graph. Since

    Kw∇L(P)‾=wK1⊔L(P)‾,\overline{K_w\nabla L(P)}=wK_1\sqcup \overline{L(P)},

    the conjecture is about the signless Laplacian spectrum of this disconnected graph.

    Result: The conjecture is true.

    Let H=L(P)‾H=\overline{L(P)}. The Petersen graph has adjacency spectrum

    3,15,(−2)4.3,1^5,(-2)^4.

    Since PP is cubic with 1010 vertices and 1515 edges,

    Spec⁡A(L(P))={4,25,(−1)4,(−2)5}.\operatorname{Spec}_A(L(P))=\{4,2^5,(-1)^4,(-2)^5\}.

    Thus HH is 1010-regular on 1515 vertices with

    Spec⁡A(H)={10,15,04,(−3)5}.\operatorname{Spec}_A(H)=\{10,1^5,0^4,(-3)^5\}.

    Hence

    Spec⁡Q(H)={20,115,104,75},\operatorname{Spec}_Q(H)=\{20,11^5,10^4,7^5\},

    and

    Spec⁡Q(wK1⊔H)={20,115,104,75,0w}.\operatorname{Spec}_Q(wK_1\sqcup H)=\{20,11^5,10^4,7^5,0^w\}.

    Let GG be any graph with this QQ-spectrum. The multiplicity of 00 as a signless Laplacian eigenvalue equals the number of bipartite connected components, because

    xTQx=∑uv∈E(G)(xu+xv)2.x^{T}Qx=\sum_{uv\in E(G)}(x_u+x_v)^2.

    Therefore GG has exactly ww bipartite components.

    We first show these bipartite components are isolated vertices. Suppose BB is a nontrivial connected bipartite component. Since Q(B)Q(B) is similar to the Laplacian L(B)L(B), its positive eigenvalues are chosen from

    {20,115,104,75}.\{20,11^5,10^4,7^5\}.

    If 2020 occurred as an eigenvalue of BB, then the largest Laplacian eigenvalue of BB would be 2020, but for a graph on ss vertices every Laplacian eigenvalue is at most ss. Since BB has at most 1616 vertices, this is impossible.

    Thus all positive Laplacian eigenvalues of BB lie in {7,10,11}\{7,10,11\}, so its algebraic connectivity is at least 77. For a connected noncomplete graph, the algebraic connectivity is at most the minimum degree, hence δ(B)≥7\delta(B)\ge 7. If BB has bipartition (X,Y)(X,Y), then ∣X∣,∣Y∣≥7|X|,|Y|\ge 7. Since BB has at most 1515 vertices, either (∣X∣,∣Y∣)=(7,7)(|X|,|Y|)=(7,7) or (7,8)(7,8). In the first case B=K7,7B=K_{7,7}, whose Laplacian spectrum contains 1414; in the second B=K7,8B=K_{7,8}, whose Laplacian spectrum contains 1515 and 88. Neither is allowed. Therefore all bipartite components are isolated.

    So G=wK1⊔YG=wK_1\sqcup Y, where YY has 1515 vertices and

    Spec⁡Q(Y)={20,115,104,75}.\operatorname{Spec}_Q(Y)=\{20,11^5,10^4,7^5\}.

    From the spectrum,

    2m(Y)=20+5⋅11+4⋅10+5⋅7=150,2m(Y)=20+5\cdot 11+4\cdot 10+5\cdot 7=150,

    so m(Y)=75m(Y)=75. Also

    tr⁡(Q(Y)2)=202+5⋅112+4⋅102+5⋅72=1650.\operatorname{tr}(Q(Y)^2)=20^2+5\cdot 11^2+4\cdot 10^2+5\cdot 7^2=1650.

    Since tr⁡(Q2)=2m+∑vd(v)2\operatorname{tr}(Q^2)=2m+\sum_v d(v)^2, we get

    ∑vd(v)2=1500.\sum_v d(v)^2=1500.

    But

    (∑vd(v))2=1502=15⋅1500,\left(\sum_v d(v)\right)^2=150^2=15\cdot 1500,

    so equality holds in Cauchy–Schwarz, and every vertex of YY has degree 1010. Hence

    Spec⁡A(Y)={10,15,04,(−3)5}.\operatorname{Spec}_A(Y)=\{10,1^5,0^4,(-3)^5\}.

    Let Z=Y‾Z=\overline{Y}. Then ZZ is 44-regular on 1515 vertices with

    Spec⁡A(Z)={4,25,(−1)4,(−2)5}.\operatorname{Spec}_A(Z)=\{4,2^5,(-1)^4,(-2)^5\}.

    We show Z≅L(P)Z\cong L(P).

    From the spectrum,

    tr⁡(AZ3)=43+5⋅23+4(−1)3+5(−2)3=60,\operatorname{tr}(A_Z^3)=4^3+5\cdot 2^3+4(-1)^3+5(-2)^3=60,

    so ZZ has 1010 triangles. Also

    tr⁡(AZ4)=44+5⋅24+4(−1)4+5(−2)4=420.\operatorname{tr}(A_Z^4)=4^4+5\cdot 2^4+4(-1)^4+5(-2)^4=420.

    For a 44-regular graph on 1515 vertices,

    tr⁡(A4)=2m+4∑v(d(v)2)+8C4=60+360+8C4,\operatorname{tr}(A^4)=2m+4\sum_v\binom{d(v)}2+8C_4=60+360+8C_4,

    so C4=0C_4=0. Thus ZZ has no 44-cycles.

    Every edge of ZZ lies in at most one triangle, since two common neighbors of an edge would create a 44-cycle. But ZZ has 3030 edges and 1010 triangles, so every edge lies in exactly one triangle. The triangles of ZZ therefore form an edge partition.

    Construct a graph BB whose vertices are the 1010 triangles of ZZ, and whose edges are the vertices of ZZ: a vertex x∈V(Z)x\in V(Z) lies in exactly two triangles, so it joins those two triangle-vertices in BB. Then BB is a simple cubic graph on 1010 vertices, and by construction

    Z≅L(B).Z\cong L(B).

    The line-graph spectrum relation for a cubic graph gives

    Spec⁡A(B)={3,15,(−2)4}.\operatorname{Spec}_A(B)=\{3,1^5,(-2)^4\}.

    Thus BB is a connected 33-regular graph with exactly three adjacency eigenvalues, hence strongly regular with parameters

    (10,3,0,1).(10,3,0,1).

    The unique graph with these parameters is the Petersen graph. Therefore B≅PB\cong P, so

    Z≅L(P),Z\cong L(P),

    and hence

    Y≅L(P)‾.Y\cong \overline{L(P)}.

    Consequently

    G≅wK1⊔L(P)‾=Kw∇L(P)‾.G\cong wK_1\sqcup \overline{L(P)} =\overline{K_w\nabla L(P)}.

    Therefore Kw∇L(P)‾\overline{K_w\nabla L(P)} is determined by its signless Laplacian spectrum.

    Citation: No external resolution is used; the proof above is self-contained apart from standard elementary spectral facts proved or verified in the argument.

  2. Read by a language model on #1 · not a proof

    model says: correctGPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1)

    scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1

    PASS

    The proof attacks the correct statement: Kw∇L(P)‾=wK1⊔L(P)‾\overline{K_w\nabla L(P)}=wK_1\sqcup \overline{L(P)}, and it gives a complete reconstruction from the signless Laplacian spectrum. The spectral computations are correct; the argument rules out nontrivial bipartite components, forces the remaining component to be 1010-regular, passes to the complement, and proves any graph adjacency-cospectral with L(P)L(P) is L(P)L(P) via the triangle/4-cycle/line-graph reconstruction and uniqueness of the Petersen graph. Minor details are compressed but fillable and not fatal. I found no existing stronger resolution in the available search attempts.

    Novelty assessment

    TYPE1

    Classification rationale: The result appears genuinely new, but it is very small in scope: a single disconnected family wK1⊔L(P)‾wK_1\sqcup \overline{L(P)}, resolved by short standard spectral arguments plus the known/elementary spectral rigidity of L(P)L(P). It would not plausibly support a standalone paper in a standard combinatorics journal; at most it is a short note or addendum to the original paper’s conjectures.

    Literature check: I found the original Abdian paper, which proves adjacency/Laplacian DS results for Kw∇L(P)K_w\nabla L(P) and poses the complement/signless-Laplacian question as an open problem. Searches for the exact conjecture, “complement of multicone graphs” + “signless Laplacian”, Kw∇L(P)K_w\nabla L(P), and “line graph of the Petersen graph” found only adjacent results: papers on connected multicone graphs, Kw∇PK_w\nabla P, and a 2019 note proving a different signless-Laplacian conjecture for other multicone joins. I did not find a published resolution of Conjecture 5.3 or a stronger statement implying it directly.

    Citation: A. Z. Abdian, “Graphs cospectral with multicone graphs Kw∇L(P)K_w\nabla L(P),” TWMS J. Appl. Eng. Math. 7(2), 181–187, 2017. Related non-target: A. Z. Abdian, S. Pouyandeh, B. Askari, “Which multicone graphs are determined by their signless Laplacian spectrum?,” J. Discrete Math. Sci. Cryptogr. 22(1), 91–99, 2019.

Sign in with an institutional address to take part in the discussion. Reading every thread stays open to everyone.

Sign in

Solve with an agent

Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.

This opens a third-party site. Nothing is posted back to ProbXiv and nothing you write there is recorded here — what a model gives you is an attempt, which a person still has to check.