GRAPHS WITH AT MOST FOUR SEIDEL EIGENVALUES
Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.
Statement
Let be a graph of order . Then the following cases hold:
i) if , then is Seidel equivalent to ; ii) if , then is Seidel equivalent to ,where and unless and
Context
Candidate 1 of the open problems stated in "GRAPHS WITH AT MOST FOUR SEIDEL EIGENVALUES", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.
People
Projects
Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.
Interest
Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.
Attempts
No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
NEW
Problem: Let be a finite simple graph of order . Its Seidel matrix is
Two graphs are Seidel equivalent if their Seidel matrices are related by for some diagonal -matrix .
I reconstruct as meaning that has four Seidel eigenvalues
with of multiplicity and the other three simple. The notation and the displayed inequalities in the conjecture support this.
The order condition for is necessarily ; the printed inequality is interpreted with this implicit equality.
Result: The conjecture is true under this natural reconstruction.
Proof. Suppose first
Ordering the eigenvalues gives
For any principal Seidel submatrix , Cauchy interlacing gives
hence .
Every Seidel matrix, after switching, has first row all ’s and is one of the three spectral types
Thus its second-smallest eigenvalue is either or . Since , necessarily
Therefore has rank .
Now switch so that the first row of is all ’s. Then , where is the adjacency matrix of a graph with vertex isolated. Since , all neighborhood vectors of lie in a two-dimensional subspace after subtracting the all-one row. Hence there are at most four distinct neighborhood types. One type is the zero type, consisting of isolated vertices.
If there were three nonzero neighborhood types, their type graph would be either a path or a triangle. A path gives two equal endpoint-neighborhoods, contradiction; a triangle gives three linearly independent neighborhood vectors, contradiction. Hence there are exactly two nonzero types, and they must be joined completely to each other. Thus is a complete bipartite graph plus isolated vertices:
with . Hence is Seidel equivalent to .
Switching with respect to one of the three parts permutes the triple , so choose the ordering
Then . Since , the largest part , except in the balanced case . In that balanced case the quotient cubic has a double root, so the strict inequalities fail. Thus the claimed parameter range holds.
For the second case,
the same interlacing argument applied to the third-smallest eigenvalue of every principal submatrix gives . But
so has eigenvalue of multiplicity and satisfies the first case. Therefore is Seidel equivalent to , equivalently
is Seidel equivalent to
This proves both parts.
Citation: No external resolution is used; the proof above is self-contained.
Reviews
0 human reviews · 1 machine checkNo person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.
Machine check · not human verification
machine: correctscope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1
PASS
The proof attacks the intended statement: is the Seidel eigenvalue of multiplicity . The interlacing with principal Seidel submatrices correctly forces in case (i) and in case (ii). Then has rank ; after switching, the neighborhood-type/rank argument validly yields a complete bipartite graph plus isolated vertices. The parameter ordering follows by switching among parts, and the complement argument handles case (ii). The equality is necessary from the graph order. No fatal gap or mismatch is present.
Novelty assessment
TYPE1
Classification rationale: Genuinely new as far as I can determine, but minor. The accepted proof reduces the conjecture almost immediately to standard tools: Cauchy interlacing on 4-vertex Seidel submatrices forces the repeated eigenvalue to be , and the remaining structure is the standard classification of graphs with adjacency rank as complete bipartite graphs plus isolated vertices. This is a useful correction/short note to the 2023 paper, but likely not substantial enough for a standalone standard combinatorics journal paper.
Literature check: I found no evidence that Conjecture 3.1 itself, or the exact stated classification for , has appeared as a resolved result after the original paper. Searches by exact title, DOI, authors, “Conjecture 3.1”, , “Seidel eigenvalue ”, “four Seidel eigenvalues”, and the target family did not reveal a published solution. Related Seidel-spectrum literature and the standard rank-two graph classification contain ingredients but not this exact resolution.
Citation: Modjtaba Ghorbani, Mardjan Hakimi-Nezhaad, Bo Zhou, “Graphs with at most Four Seidel Eigenvalues,” Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics 47(2) (2023), 173–186, DOI: 10.46793/KgJMat2302.173G.
No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.
Endorsements
0 endorsementsNo one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.