ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

Grothendieck's Finite Flat Group Scheme Order Question

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

grothendieck-finite-flat-group-schemesAlgebraposed by Alexander Grothendieck, 1966recorded: disproved

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

Grothendieck asked whether every finite locally free group scheme of order nn is killed by nn (its nn-th convolution power map equals the unit). The counterexample is an order-4 group scheme not killed by 4 (killed only by 8); since Deligne settled the commutative case, it is necessarily non-commutative over a non-reduced base.

Context

A Grothendieck question open for sixty years, known through arithmetic geometry.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    constructionGPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Fable 5 with Akhil Mathew, Kevin Buzzard ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Fable 5
    people
    Akhil Mathew, Kevin Buzzard

    OpenAI's Sol found an explicit counterexample, a rank-4 Hopf algebra over Z[a,b]/(a3,b3,a2b+2)\mathbb{Z}[a,b]/(a^3, b^3, a^2 b + 2) whose order-4 group scheme is not killed by 4, and Claude Fable 5 autoformalized the full argument in Lean within hours. Akhil Mathew directed the work and submitted it to Mathlib; Kevin Buzzard independently compiled and checked the 1076-line proof.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from Lean ·

      scope Lean formalization of the result

      Machine-checked in Lean and submitted to Mathlib (PR #41748, opened 2026-07-14, disclosed as built with OpenAI's Codex and Anthropic's Claude under the author's direction). Kevin Buzzard independently compiled the 1076-line proof and confirmed it uses only standard mathlib definitions. Under active expert review (Wieser, Brasca) and not yet merged; no journal publication yet, but the counterexample is explicit and kernel-checked.

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.