ProbXiv
sign in
unchecked

The Homogeneous Polynomial Lyapunov Converse Conjecture

Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.

homogeneous-polynomial-lyapunov-conjectureDifferential equationsposed by Amir Ali Ahmadi, Pablo Parrilo, 2011recorded: disproved

1 attempt · no person has looked

Statement

Does every globally asymptotically stable homogeneous polynomial vector field admit a homogeneous polynomial Lyapunov function? No. A planar homogeneous cubic vector field with integer coefficients is globally asymptotically stable yet admits no positive definite homogeneous polynomial with nonpositive Lie derivative, and no real-analytic Lyapunov function even locally, though it does have exponential and rational strict Lyapunov functions.

Context

A converse-Lyapunov question that underpins sum-of-squares stability certification, and the reason polynomial Lyapunov search is presumed complete for homogeneous systems.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    constructionGPT-5.6-Sol Pro, Codex (GPT-5.6-Sol Ultra) with Jun Liu, Maxwell Fitzsimmons ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.6-Sol Pro, Codex (GPT-5.6-Sol Ultra)
    people
    Jun Liu, Maxwell Fitzsimmons

    The acknowledgement is direct: the authors used GPT-5.6-Sol Pro to discover the counterexample and to produce initial versions of the mathematical arguments in Sections II to IV. Codex assisted with drafting and with the Lean 4 formalization. The authors independently verified all AI-generated content.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 0 machine checks

    No person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.