ProbXiv
sign in
unchecked

Mixing Time of Kac's Walk on the Rotation Group

Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.

kac-walk-rotation-mixingProbability & statisticsposed by Walk introduced by W. K. Hastings; optimal rate the standing target of the mixing-time literature, 1970recorded: solved

1 attempt · no person has looked

Statement

Kac's walk on the rotation group, introduced by Hastings in 1970, is a central high-dimensional Markov chain in statistical physics and computational science. The paper proves it mixes in n2lognn^2 \log n steps, the conjectured optimal rate, closing the gap left by a long line of successive improvements.

Context

The mixing time of Kac's walk on SO(n) has been a standing target of the Markov chain community since Hastings (1970), with a documented ladder of bounds by Diaconis-Saloff-Coste, Pillai-Smith and others.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    proof attemptGPT Pro 5.4 with Natesh S. Pillai, Aaron Smith ·
    AI involvement
    ai co developed
    a person and a model developed the result together.
    models
    GPT Pro 5.4
    people
    Natesh S. Pillai, Aaron Smith

    "Much of this paper was developed in collaboration with GPT Pro 5.4. In particular, the idea of using matrix martingale inequalities" came from that collaboration. Pillai and Smith are the authors of the previous best bounds for this walk.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 0 machine checks

    No person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.