ProbXiv
sign in
unchecked

The Kinoshita Conjecture and Kirby Problem 4.37

Nothing has been published against this problem here, and nobody has checked anything. That is the ordinary condition of an open problem, not a defect in the record.

kirby-4-37-irreducible-projective-planeGeometry & topologyposed by Shin'ichi Kinoshita; Problem 4.37 of the Kirby listrecorded: disproved

1 attempt · no person has looked

Statement

Kinoshita conjectured that every embedded projective plane in S4S^4 is reducible. False: an irreducible embedded projective plane exists in S4S^4. The construction also answers both parts of Problem 4.37 of the Kirby problem list.

Context

A named conjecture plus a numbered problem from the Kirby list, the standard catalogue of open questions in low-dimensional topology.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. 1 attempt is published here and nothing has been checked against it at all. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    constructionChatGPT, Cursor and Gemini with Mark Hughes, Seungwon Kim, Maggie Miller, Gheehyun Nahm ·
    AI involvement
    ai assisted
    a person led the work and used a model along the way.
    models
    ChatGPT, Cursor and Gemini
    people
    Mark Hughes, Seungwon Kim, Maggie Miller, Gheehyun Nahm

    Deliberately bounded, and the authors draw the boundary themselves: they acknowledge using ChatGPT, Cursor and Gemini during initial exploration and computation, and state that all final computations were performed and verified by the authors without the use of AI. So the models were exploratory instruments and none of the standing mathematics rests on them.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 0 machine checks

    No person has reviewed this attempt. It has not been checked at all.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.