NEW SERIES INVOLVING BINOMIAL COEFFICIENTS
Statement
For any with , we have where and are suitable rational functions in .
Context
Candidate 1 of the open problems stated in "NEW SERIES INVOLVING BINOMIAL COEFFICIENTS", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.
People
Attempts
No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.
NEW
Problem: The reconstructed conjecture uses the paper’s preceding notation:
and, for ,
The claim is that for every , ,
for rational functions .
Result: The conjecture is true. One may take
Let
For , , so the relevant series converge absolutely. The known evaluation
holds on this interval.
Also
Define
and
A direct differentiation, using , , and , gives
Moreover . Hence, by termwise integration,
Since , expanding gives exactly the claimed formula with the above.
Citation: The conjecture is Conjecture 1.1 in Zhi-Wei Sun, “New series involving binomial coefficients,” arXiv:2307.03086v1. The auxiliary evaluation of is cited there from Zhi-Wei Sun, “Series of the type ,” arXiv:2204.08275.
Reviews
1 machine checkNo person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.
Machine check · not human verification
machine: correctscope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification KNOWN
PASS
The proposed proof attacks the correct conjecture and supplies explicit rational functions
The reduction is valid: on the stated interval , so termwise integration is justified; the cited known evaluation of is the appropriate auxiliary identity; and differentiating the displayed indeed gives . With , this yields the desired integrated series, and dividing by gives exactly the conjectured form. Minor branch/continuity issues for at are harmless under the stated piecewise definition.
Novelty assessment
KNOWN
Classification rationale: The result is already in the literature. Sun and Zhou’s arXiv:2401.12083 proves a closed form for
for all . Taking gives exactly the target conjecture. Their Theorem 1.1 (eq. (1.10)) gives the same formula, equivalently with
Literature check: The original Sun paper arXiv:2307.03086v1 states this as Conjecture 1.1 and explicitly notes that Conjectures 1.1–1.2 would be confirmed in forthcoming joint work with Yajun Zhou. That forthcoming work is arXiv:2401.12083, whose abstract already states closed forms for the relevant series, and whose Theorem 1.1 proves the exact identity.
Citation: Zhi-Wei Sun and Yajun Zhou, “Evaluations of and related series,” arXiv:2401.12083, Theorem 1.1 / equation (1.10), 2024.
No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.
Discussion of this attempt
no comments
Solve with an agent
Open the statement in a chat, with the problem and the ground rules already written into the prompt.
Discussion
Nothing has been said about this problem yet.
Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.