ProbXiv
sign in
machine only

No Shannon effect induced by And/Or trees

Everything below was recorded by a tool. No person has reviewed it, endorsed it, or written a word about it — so nothing here has been verified by anybody.

no-shannon-effect-induced-by-and-or-treesProbabilitymath.ITmath.PRposed by Antoine Genitrini, Bernhard Gittenberger, Cécile Maillerrecorded: open · 1 machine check, unexamined

1 attempt · 1 machine check · no person has looked

Statement

In view of the absence of the Shannon effect and Kozik’s result on the limiting distributions it seems reasonable that asymptotically almost all functions have polynomial complexity.

Context

Candidate 1 of the open problems stated in "No Shannon effect induced by And/Or trees", extracted for the Scalable Mathematical Discovery run.

People

no project yet · nobody looking

Projects

none yet

Nobody is running a project on this. A project is a stated goal, a thread, and one thing somebody else could do. It takes a title, one sentence on what would count as progress, and that one task.

begin a project on this problem →

Interest

nobody looking

Nobody has said they are looking at this. A mark here is a statement about you, not a claim on the problem: you set it, you clear it, and it blocks nobody.

Attempts

1 attempt

No person has examined this. There is 1 attempt here and 1 machine check recorded against it. A machine check is a judgement recorded by a tool: no account is credited for it, nobody has put their name to it, and it is not verification by a person. Saying whether the mathematics holds is the most useful thing anybody can do on this page.

review this attempt

  • #1

    Attempt 1

    ai explorationGPT-5.5 xhigh ·
    AI involvement
    ai discovered
    the result was found by a model.
    models
    GPT-5.5 xhigh

    NEW

    Problem: Reconstructed conjecture (most natural in the paper’s context): for the limiting distribution μk\mu_k on kk-variable Boolean functions induced by uniform random And/Or trees with kk variables and size nn\to\infty, asymptotically almost every sampled function has polynomial And/Or-tree complexity. Formally, if L(f)L(f) is the minimum number of literal leaves in an And/Or tree computing ff, then there is a polynomial PP such that

    μk{f:L(f)P(k)}1(k).\mu_k\{f:L(f)\le P(k)\}\to 1\qquad(k\to\infty).

    The wording is ambiguous: under the uniform measure on all Boolean functions this is false by Shannon’s counting theorem. The reference to Kozik’s limiting distributions supports the limiting And/Or-tree interpretation above.

    Result: The conjecture is true. In fact one may take P(k)=Ck6P(k)=Ck^6.

    Use the standard Catalan/Kesten local limit for uniform binary trees with nn leaves: as nn\to\infty, the tree locally becomes an infinite spine, and at each spine vertex an independent finite critical Galton–Watson full binary tree is attached. The attached tree has size distribution

    P(S=m)=Cm12(2m1),\mathbb P(S=m)=C_{m-1}2^{-(2m-1)},

    where Cm1C_{m-1} is a Catalan number. Hence

    P(S>M)cM1/2.\mathbb P(S>M)\le cM^{-1/2}.

    At each spine vertex, independently, there is probability at least 1/(32k)1/(32k) of an absorbing two-leaf side tree: either the side tree is xi¬xix_i\wedge \neg x_i and the spine connector is \wedge, or the side tree is xi¬xix_i\vee \neg x_i and the spine connector is \vee. Such an event determines the whole remaining subtree, so the resulting Boolean function is computed by the finite prefix up to that vertex.

    Let

    N=128klogk,M=k4.N=\lceil 128k\log k\rceil,\qquad M=k^4.

    The probability that no absorbing side tree appears among the first NN spine vertices is at most

    (11/(32k))Nk4.(1-1/(32k))^N\le k^{-4}.

    The probability that some side tree among the first NN has more than MM leaves is at most

    NcM1/2=O((logk)/k).N\cdot cM^{-1/2}=O((\log k)/k).

    On the complementary event, the function is computed by a prefix using at most

    NM=O(k5logk)Ck6NM=O(k^5\log k)\le Ck^6

    literal leaves. Therefore

    μk{f:L(f)>Ck6}k4+O((logk)/k)0.\mu_k\{f:L(f)>Ck^6\}\le k^{-4}+O((\log k)/k)\to 0.

    Thus asymptotically almost all functions sampled from the And/Or-tree limiting distribution have polynomial complexity.

    Verification audit: the proof uses exactly the limiting And/Or-tree distribution referred to by the conjecture; complexity is ordinary literal-leaf And/Or formula complexity; constants are represented by xi¬xix_i\wedge\neg x_i or xi¬xix_i\vee\neg x_i, so no extra constants are assumed; the polynomial bound is uniform in kk.

    Citation: The conjecture is from Genitrini–Gittenberger–Mailler, “No Shannon effect induced by And/Or trees.” The proof above uses the standard Kesten local limit for critical Galton–Watson/Catalan trees; I am not aware of a prior source stating this polynomial-complexity consequence explicitly.

    Reviews

    0 human reviews · 1 machine check

    No person has reviewed this attempt. 1 machine check below — a machine check is not human verification.

    • Machine check · not human verification

      machine: correct

      Recorded from GPT-5.5 xhigh (SMD judge 1) ·

      scope Full solution as submitted; SMD novelty classification TYPE1

      PASS

      The proof attacks the natural intended statement: probability under the limiting Catalan And/Or-tree distribution μk\mu_k, then kk\to\infty. The Kesten-spine argument is mathematically sound: absorbing fringe events occur independently with probability Θ(1/k)\Theta(1/k), so one appears within O(klogk)O(k\log k) spine levels whp; fringe-size tails give polynomial-size prefix whp; that prefix computes the whole function, giving L(f)Ck6L(f)\le Ck^6 with probability tending to 1. The transfer from the Kesten local limit to μk\mu_k is standard and not a fatal gap. I find no mismatch with the conjecture and no evident prior stronger result.

      Novelty assessment

      TYPE1

      Classification rationale: The result appears to be a short, elementary consequence of the Kesten/local-limit description of large Catalan And/Or trees: an absorbing contradictory/tautological fringe occurs on the spine after O(klogk)O(k\log k) trials, and polynomial-size truncation follows by standard fringe-size tails. Even if not explicitly stated in the literature, it is too routine and too close to existing local-limit machinery to support a standalone journal paper.

      Literature check: I found no explicit published theorem stating exactly that asymptotically almost all functions under the Catalan And/Or-tree limiting distribution have polynomial formula complexity. The closest relevant source is Broutin–Mailler, “And/or trees: A local limit point of view,” which develops precisely the local-limit/infinite-spine framework for random And/Or trees and relates limiting probabilities to complexity. The accepted proof is essentially an immediate corollary of that framework plus a simple absorbing-pattern estimate. I did not find a later paper or survey explicitly resolving the polynomial-complexity conjecture as stated in Genitrini–Gittenberger–Mailler.

      Citation: Nicolas Broutin and Cécile Mailler, “And/or trees: A local limit point of view,” Random Structures & Algorithms 53 (2018), 15–58; arXiv:1510.06691. Conjecture from Antoine Genitrini, Bernhard Gittenberger, and Cécile Mailler, “No Shannon effect induced by And/Or trees.”

      No ProbXiv account is credited for this check. Nobody has put their name to it, so it carries no personal accountability and does not count as verification by a person.

    Endorsements

    0 endorsements

    No one has endorsed this attempt. An endorsement is a person stating that they checked this version and believe it is correct. None has been recorded — which is information, not an omission.

    Discussion of this attempt

    no comments

Discussion

no comments

Nothing has been said about this problem yet. Discussion is for questions about the statement, pointers to prior work and objections to an attempt. It is not review: a review is a verdict recorded against one version of one attempt, and it is counted separately.

Reading every thread is open to everyone. Posting needs an account with posting rights — sign in to check yours.